Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19770473›Full record

Trial reportNeurology2009

Randomized, controlled trial of telcagepant for the acute treatment of migraine.

K M Connor, R E Shapiro, H-C Diener, S Lucas, J Kost, X Fan, K Fei, C Assaid, C Lines, Tony W Ho

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Neurology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00432237 (A Phase III, Multicenter, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial to Study the Safety and Efficacy of Oral MK0974 in the Acute Treatment of Migraine With or Without Aura), which is not on this map. Cited by 78 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
78citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00432237 phase3completednot on this map

A Phase III, Multicenter, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial to Study the Safety and Efficacy of Oral MK0974 in the Acute Treatment of Migraine With or Without Aura

TypeinterventionalSponsorMerck Sharp & Dohme LLCRan2007 to 2007Enrolled1,703ConditionsMigraineArmsMK0974 50 mg, MK0974 150 mg, MK0974 300 mg, Comparator: Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

78 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Update of Gepants in the Treatment of Chronic Migraine.Current pain and headache reports · 2023
    Review
  16. Molecular Mechanisms of Migraine: Nitric Oxide Synthase and Neuropeptides.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  17. Meningeal Mechanisms and the Migraine Connection.Annual review of neuroscience · 2023
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article

18 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

K M ConnorMerck Research Laboratories, North Wales, PA 19454-1099, USA.
R E Shapiro
H-C Diener
S Lucas
J Kost
X Fan
K Fei
C Assaid
C Lines
Tony W Ho

Funding

Prepregnancy Phenotype &Predisposition to Pre-eclampsiaR01HL071944 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT &ST AGRIC COLLEGE · PI BERNSTEIN, IRA MARK · 2004 to 2014
$3.0M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01HL71944
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe neuropeptide calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) plays a key role in migraine pathophysiology. In this large phase 3 clinical trial, we sought to confirm the efficacy of telcagepant, the first orally bioavailable CGRP receptor antagonist.

methodsAdults with migraine with or without aura (International Headache Society criteria) treated a moderate or severe attack with oral telcagepant 50 mg (n = 177), 150 mg (n = 381), 300 mg (n = 371), or placebo (n = 365) in a randomized, double-blind trial. The 5 co-primary endpoints were pain freedom, pain relief, and absence of photophobia, absence of phonophobia, and absence of nausea, all at 2 hours postdose. The key secondary endpoint was 2-24 hour sustained pain freedom. The prespecified primary efficacy analyses evaluated the 150 mg and 300 mg groups; the 50-mg group was included on an exploratory basis to further characterize the dose response but was not prespecified for analysis. Tolerability was assessed by adverse experience reports.

resultsTelcagepant 300 mg was more effective (p <or= 0.001) than placebo on all primary endpoints and the key secondary endpoint, as was telcagepant 150 mg (p <or= 0.05). Telcagepant 300 mg showed a slight numeric advantage over telcagepant 150 mg on most measures. Telcagepant 50 mg values were numerically intermediate between placebo and telcagepant 150 mg and 300 mg. The percentages of patients with adverse experiences were 32.2% for telcagepant 50 mg, 32.0% for telcagepant 150 mg, 36.2% for telcagepant 300 mg, and 32.2% for placebo.

conclusionsThis study confirmed previous findings that telcagepant 300 mg was effective at relieving pain and other migraine symptoms at 2 hours and providing sustained pain freedom up to 24 hours. In this study, telcagepant 150 mg was also effective. Telcagepant was generally well tolerated.

Indexed as

Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide Receptor AntagonistsAcute DiseaseAdultAzepinesCalcitonin Gene-Related PeptideDose-Response Relationship, DrugDouble-Blind MethodEndpoint DeterminationFemaleHumansHyperacusisImidazolesMaleMiddle AgedMigraine DisordersNauseaAzepinesCalcitonin Gene-Related PeptideCalcitonin Gene-Related Peptide Receptor AntagonistsImidazolesPlacebosReceptors, Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptidetelcagepant

Identifiers

PMID19770473
PMCPMC2754336

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.