Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19770438›Full record

ArticleArchives of dermatology2009

Youth access to artificial UV radiation exposure: practices of 3647 US indoor tanning facilities.

Latrice C Pichon, Joni A Mayer, Katherine D Hoerster, Susan I Woodruff, Donald J Slymen, George E Belch, Elizabeth J Clapp, Ami L Hurd, Jean L Forster, Martin A Weinstock

Abstract readComparative StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of dermatology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Assessing the content and comprehensiveness of provincial and territorial indoor tanning legislation in Canada.Health promotion and chronic disease prevention in Canada : research, policy and practice · 2019
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Evaluation of Project Students are Sun Safe (SASS): A University Student-Delivered Skin Cancer Prevention Program for Schools.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2015
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. State indoor tanning laws and adolescent indoor tanning.American journal of public health · 2014
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Latrice C PichonGraduate School of Public Health, 9245 Sky Park Ct, Ste 220, San Diego, CA 92123, USA.
Joni A Mayer
Katherine D Hoerster
Susan I Woodruff
Donald J Slymen
George E Belch
Elizabeth J Clapp
Ami L Hurd
Jean L Forster
Martin A Weinstock

Funding

Multi-level Assessment of Indoor Tanning PracticesR01CA093532 · NCI · SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI MAYER, JONI A · 2003 to 2008
$2.5M
Community-based Skin Cancer Prevention ResearchK05CA100051 · NCI · SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI MAYER, JONI A · 2003 to 2007
$587k
NCI NIH HHS 5 R01 CA093532NCI NIH HHS 5 R01 CA093532S1NCI NIH HHS K05 CA100051NCI NIH HHS R01 CA093532NCI NIH HHS R01 CA093532S1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo assess indoor tanning facility practices in a sample of facilities in 116 cities representing all 50 states.

designCross-sectional study.

settingUnited States.

participantsEmployees of 3647 indoor tanning facilities were contacted by telephone. Data collectors (ie, confederates) posed as prospective, fair-skinned, 15-year-old female customers who had never tanned before.

main outcome measuresConfederates asked respondents about their facility's practices related to parental consent, parental accompaniment, and allowable tanning session frequency.

resultsApproximately 87% of the facilities required parental consent, 14% required parental accompaniment, 5% said they would not allow the confederate to tan owing to her age, and 71% would allow tanning every day the first week of indoor tanning. In Wisconsin, which bans indoor tanning among those younger than 16 years, 70% of facilities would not allow the confederate to tan. Multivariate analyses indicated that facilities in states with a youth access law were significantly more likely to require parental consent (P <.001) and parental accompaniment (P <.001) than those in states without a youth access law. Law was not significantly related to allowable tanning frequency (P = .81). Conclusion We recommend that additional states pass youth access legislation, preferably in the form of bans.

Indexed as

AdolescentBeauty CultureCooperative BehaviorCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHealth Services AccessibilityHumansMorbidityNeoplasms, Radiation-InducedParental ConsentRisk FactorsSkin NeoplasmsUltraviolet RaysUnited States

Identifiers

PMID19770438
PMCPMC2769519

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.