ArticleCNS neuroscience & therapeutics2010
Neurological and cardiovascular adverse events associated with antimanic treatment in children and adolescents.
Article in CNS neuroscience & therapeutics, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Coronary Artery Disease in Patients with Severe Mental Illness.Interventional cardiology (London, England) · 2023Review
- Obstructive Sleep Apnea in Children and Adolescents and the Risk of Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events: A Nationwide Cohort Study in Taiwan.Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine · 2019Article
- Use of Psychotropic Medications among Youth in Treatment Foster Care.Journal of child and family studies · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
To identify the factors associated with incident neurological and cardiovascular adverse events in children and adolescents treated with antimanic agents, a retrospective, longitudinal study was conducted. Medicaid medical and pharmacy claims between January 1996 and December 2005 were used to identify 3657 children and adolescents prescribed antimanic medications, and a random sample of 4500 children not treated with psychotropic medications. All adverse events examined (sedation/drowsiness, headaches, involuntary movements/extrapyramidal symptoms (EPS), cardiovascular events, hypertension, and orthostatic hypotension) were more prevalent in the antimanic-treated cohort. The odds of developing incident sedation/drowsiness and headaches were significantly higher for those prescribed carbamazepine, and co-prescribed selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors or antipsychotics. The odds of incident involuntary movements/EPS were significantly higher for those co-prescribed antimanic and antipsychotic agents, and those with comorbid central nervous system (CNS), organic brain disorders/mental retardation, or epilepsy. Incident cardiovascular events, hypertension, and orthostatic hypotension odds were significantly higher for those co-prescribed antimanic agents and antipsychotics, or those with comorbid epilepsy or metabolic conditions. Co-prescription of antimanic and antipsychotic agents is more likely associated with neurological and cardiovascular adverse reactions, especially in young patients with preexisting CNS/neurological disorders.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.