Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19769011›Full record

ArticleEthnicity & disease2009

Disparities in the prevalence of diabetes: is it race/ethnicity or socioeconomic status? Results from the Boston Area Community Health (BACH) survey.

Carol L Link, John B McKinlay

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ethnicity & disease, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 74 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
74citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

74 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Outcomes of a Weight Loss Intervention to Prevent Diabetes Among Low-Income Residents of East Harlem, New York.Health education & behavior : the official publication of the Society for Public Health Education · 2019
    Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Social Determinants of Health Screening in Type 1 Diabetes Management.Endocrinology and metabolism clinics of North America · 2024
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. When public health crises collide: Social disparities and COVID-19.International journal of clinical practice · 2020
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

14 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Carol L LinkNew England Research Institutes, Watertown, MA 02472, USA. clink@neriscience.com
John B McKinlay

Funding

Trajectories of Urologic Disease: Follow-up of BACHU01DK056842 · NIDDK · NEW ENGLAND RESEARCH INSTITUTES, INC. · PI MCKINLAY, JOHN B · 2001 to 2011
$15.7M
Trajectories of Urologic Disease: Follow-up of BACHR01DK056842 · NIDDK · NEW ENGLAND RESEARCH INSTITUTES, INC. · PI MCKINLAY, JOHN B · 2007 to 2007
$1.2M
NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK056842NIDDK NIH HHS U01 DK056842NIDDK NIH HHS U01 DK56842
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesMany researchers and clinicians continue to believe that non-modifiable race/ ethnicity is a major contributor to diabetes, prompting a well-intentioned search for genetic and bio-physiological explanations. We seek to reinforce earlier findings showing that socioeconomic status is more strongly associated with diabetes prevalence than race/ ethnicity and suggests a very different and potentially modifiable etiologic pathway.

methodsA community-based epidemiologic survey of 5503 Boston residents aged 30-79 years (1767 Black, 1877 Hispanic, 1859 White; 2301 men and 3202 women).

resultsAfter adjusting for age and sex, Blacks and Hispanics have statistically significantly increased odds of having diabetes: Black (OR, 2.0; 95% CI, 1.4-2.9) and Hispanic (2.4; CI 1.6-3.4) compared to Whites. If socioeconomic status, a combination of education and income, is added to the model, these odds are reduced for both Blacks (OR 1.6; CI, 1.1-2.2) and Hispanics (OR 1.6; CI, 1.1-2.3). In a multivariate logistic regression adjusting for age, sex, socioeconomic status, obesity, hypertension, gestational diabetes, physical activity, trouble paying for basics, health insurance status, and family history of diabetes, these odds are reduced further: Black (OR 1.0; CI, 0.7-1.5) and Hispanic (OR 1.3; CI, 0.9-2.1) and are no longer statistically significant.

conclusionsConsistent with other reports, we find socioeconomic status has a much stronger association with diabetes prevalence than race/ethnicity. Continuing to focus on race/ethnicity as a primary determinant of diabetes prevalence overemphasizes the importance of biomedical factors and diverts effort from socio-medical interventions such as improving social circumstances, access to effective care, and upstream redistributive social policies.

Indexed as

Health Status DisparitiesAdultAgedBlack or African AmericanBody Mass IndexBostonComorbidityDiabetes MellitusFemaleHealth SurveysHispanic or LatinoHumansHypertensionInsurance, HealthMaleMiddle Aged

Identifiers

PMID19769011
PMCPMC3706078

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.