Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19768463›Full record

ArticleHistochemistry and cell biology2009

Selection of buffer pH by the isoelectric point of the antigen for the efficient heat-induced epitope retrieval: re-appraisal for nuclear protein pathobiology.

Hanako Kajiya, Susumu Takekoshi, Mao Takei, Noboru Egashira, Takashi Miyakoshi, Akihito Serizawa, Akira Teramoto, Robert Y Osamura

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Histochemistry and cell biology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Hanako KajiyaDepartment of Pathology, Tokai University School of Medicine, 143 Shimokasuya, Boseidai Isehara, Kanagawa, 259-1193, Japan. hanakokj@is.icc.u-tokai.ac.jp
Susumu Takekoshi
Mao Takei
Noboru Egashira
Takashi Miyakoshi
Akihito Serizawa
Akira Teramoto
Robert Y Osamura
Tokai University · JPNippon Medical School · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Epitope retrieval (ER) using heating causes a dramatic improvement in the sensitivity of immunohistochemistry for formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue sections. Here, the relationship between the pH of the retrieval buffer used for heat-induced epitope retrieval (HIER) and the isoelectric points (pI) of the antigen recognized by antibodies against nuclear proteins (mainly human pituitary transcription factors in this study) was investigated using FFPE tissue sections. A universal buffer, with a buffering capacity over a wide pH range from 2.0 to 12.0, was used for HIER. We found that the intensity of staining for most nuclear proteins after HIER depended simply on the pH of the buffer. Importantly, for efficient HIER, antigens with acidic pI required basic pH buffer conditions, while antigens with alkaline pI required acidic conditions. This implies that the electrostatic charge of the antigens contributed significantly to the efficiency of HIER. We conclude that appropriate selection of the pH of the buffer based on the pI of the individual antigens is of great importance for efficient ER. It is concluded that the mechanism of HEIR may, therefore, depend to a large extent on the pI of the antigen under investigation.

Indexed as

AntibodiesAntigensBuffersEpitopesFormaldehydeHot TemperatureHumansHydrogen-Ion ConcentrationImmunohistochemistryIsoelectric PointNuclear ProteinsParaffin EmbeddingTissue FixationAntibodiesAntigensBuffersEpitopesFormaldehydeNuclear Proteins

Identifiers

PMID19768463
OpenAlexW1988020718

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.