Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19768410›Full record

ReviewCurrent topics in microbiology and immunology2009

Recombinant vectors as influenza vaccines.

Sarah A Kopecky-Bromberg, Peter Palese

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current topics in microbiology and immunology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
10.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Viral vector-based influenza vaccines.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2016
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Molecular Characterization, Expression and Functional Analysis of ChickenInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2018
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Novel viral vectored vaccines for the prevention of influenza.Molecular medicine (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2012
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Development of adenoviral vector-based mucosal vaccine against influenza.Journal of molecular medicine (Berlin, Germany) · 2011
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sarah A Kopecky-BrombergDepartment of Microbiology, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY 10029-6574, USA.
Peter Palese
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai · US

Funding

Viral Pathogenesis and TherapeuticsU54AI057158 · NIAID · WADSWORTH CENTER · PI LEVY, DAVID E · 2003 to 2014
$100.8M
Live attenuated vaccines for epidemic and pandemic fluU01AI070469 · NIAID · ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI · PI GARCIA-SASTRE, ADOLFO · 2006 to 2010
$9.7M
NIAID NIH HHS U01 AI070469NIAID NIH HHS U54 AI057158
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The antiquated system used to manufacture the currently licensed inactivated influenza virus vaccines would not be adequate during an influenza virus pandemic. There is currently a search for vaccines that can be developed faster and provide superior, long-lasting immunity to influenza virus as well as other highly pathogenic viruses and bacteria. Recombinant vectors provide a safe and effective method to elicit a strong immune response to a foreign protein or epitope. This review explores the advantages and limitations of several different vectors that are currently being tested, and highlights some of the newer viruses being used as recombinant vectors.

Indexed as

AdenoviridaeAnimalsGenetic VectorsHumansInfluenza VaccinesNewcastle disease virusOrthomyxoviridaePoxviridaeVaccines, SyntheticVesiculovirusInfluenza VaccinesVaccines, Synthetic

Identifiers

PMID19768410
PMCPMC7115000
OpenAlexW141559607

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.