ArticleThe Analyst2009
Interactions of sulfur-containing acridine ligands with DNA by ESI-MS.
Article in The Analyst, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Review
- Rapid characterization of cross-links, mono-adducts, and non-covalent binding of psoralens to deoxyoligonucleotides by LC-UV/ESI-MS and IRMPD mass spectrometry.The Analyst · 2010Article
- Tandem mass spectrometry for characterization of covalent adducts of DNA with anticancer therapeutics.Mass spectrometry reviewsReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The alkylating proficiency of sulfur-containing mustards may be increased by using an acridine moiety to guide the sulfur mustard to its cellular target. In this study, the interactions of a new series of sulfur-containing acridine ligands, some that also function as alkylating mustards, with DNA were evaluated by electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (ESI-MS). Relative binding affinities were estimated from the ESI-MS data based on the fraction of bound DNA for DNA/acridine mixtures. The extent of binding observed for the series of sulfur-containing acridines was similar, presumably because the intercalating acridine moiety was identical. Upon infrared multi-photon dissociation (IRMPD) of the resulting oligonucleotide/sulfur-containing acridine complexes, ejection of the ligand was the dominant pathway for most of the complexes. However, for AS4, an acridine sulfide mustard, and AN1, an acridine nitrogen mustard, strand separation with the ligand remaining on one of the single strands was observed. At higher irradiation times, a variety of sequence ions were observed, some retaining the AS4/AN1 ligand, which was indicative of covalent binding.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.