Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19768213›Full record

ArticleThe Analyst2009

Interactions of sulfur-containing acridine ligands with DNA by ESI-MS.

Suncerae I Smith, Frank S Guziec, Lynn Guziec, Jennifer S Brodbelt

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Analyst, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Suncerae I SmithDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712, USA.
Frank S Guziec
Lynn Guziec
Jennifer S Brodbelt
Georgetown University · USThe University of Texas at Austin · US

Funding

Design and Characterization of DNA Interactive AgentsR01GM065956 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AUSTIN · PI BRODBELT, JENNIFER S. · 2003 to 2011
$2.1M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM065956NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM65956
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The alkylating proficiency of sulfur-containing mustards may be increased by using an acridine moiety to guide the sulfur mustard to its cellular target. In this study, the interactions of a new series of sulfur-containing acridine ligands, some that also function as alkylating mustards, with DNA were evaluated by electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (ESI-MS). Relative binding affinities were estimated from the ESI-MS data based on the fraction of bound DNA for DNA/acridine mixtures. The extent of binding observed for the series of sulfur-containing acridines was similar, presumably because the intercalating acridine moiety was identical. Upon infrared multi-photon dissociation (IRMPD) of the resulting oligonucleotide/sulfur-containing acridine complexes, ejection of the ligand was the dominant pathway for most of the complexes. However, for AS4, an acridine sulfide mustard, and AN1, an acridine nitrogen mustard, strand separation with the ligand remaining on one of the single strands was observed. At higher irradiation times, a variety of sequence ions were observed, some retaining the AS4/AN1 ligand, which was indicative of covalent binding.

Indexed as

AcridinesBase SequenceDNALigandsNucleic Acid DenaturationPhotonsSpectrometry, Mass, Electrospray IonizationSulfurTransition TemperatureAcridinesDNALigandsSulfur

Identifiers

PMID19768213
PMCPMC2892893
OpenAlexW2038915766

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.