Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19767618›Full record

ArticleNucleic acids research2009

Phylogenetic screening of a bacterial, metagenomic library using homing endonuclease restriction and marker insertion.

Pui Yi Yung, Catherine Burke, Matt Lewis, Suhelen Egan, Staffan Kjelleberg, Torsten Thomas

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nucleic acids research, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Clinical Resistome Screening of 1,110Frontiers in microbiology · 2019
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Metagenomics - a guide from sampling to data analysis.Microbial informatics and experimentation · 2012
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Pui Yi YungCentre for Marine Bio-Innovation and School of Biotechnology and Biomolecular Sciences, University of New South Wales, 2035 NSW, Australia.
Catherine Burke
Matt Lewis
Suhelen Egan
Staffan Kjelleberg
Torsten Thomas

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Metagenomics provides access to the uncultured majority of the microbial world. The approaches employed in this field have, however, had limited success in linking functional genes to the taxonomic or phylogenetic origin of the organism they belong to. Here we present an efficient strategy to recover environmental DNA fragments that contain phylogenetic marker genes from metagenomic libraries. Our method involves the cleavage of 23S ribsosmal RNA (rRNA) genes within pooled library clones by the homing endonuclease I-CeuI followed by the insertion and selection of an antibiotic resistance cassette. This approach was applied to screen a library of 6500 fosmid clones derived from the microbial community associated with the sponge Cymbastela concentrica. Several fosmid clones were recovered after the screen and detailed phylogenetic and taxonomic assignment based on the rRNA gene showed that they belong to previously unknown organisms. In addition, compositional features of these fosmid clones were used to classify and taxonomically assign a dataset of environmental shotgun sequences. Our approach represents a valuable tool for the analysis of rapidly increasing, environmental DNA sequencing information.

Indexed as

EndodeoxyribonucleasesGenome, BacterialGenomic LibraryPhylogenyAnimalsBacteriaBase SequenceDNA Restriction EnzymesGenes, rRNAGenetic MarkersMetagenomicsMolecular Sequence DataPoriferaRNA, Ribosomal, 23SDNA Restriction Enzymesendodeoxyribonuclease I-CeuIEndodeoxyribonucleasesGenetic MarkersRNA, Ribosomal, 23S

Identifiers

PMID19767618
PMCPMC2790883

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.