ArticleBrain : a journal of neurology2009
Prevalence of genetic muscle disease in Northern England: in-depth analysis of a muscle clinic population.
Article in Brain : a journal of neurology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 234 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
234 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 529 citations in OpenAlex.
- Global prevalence of Duchenne and Becker muscular dystrophy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2022Pooled it
- A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Prevalence of Congenital Myopathy.Frontiers in neurology · 2021Pooled it
- Global epidemiology of Duchenne muscular dystrophy: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2020Pooled it
- Genetic and Clinical Advances of Congenital Muscular Dystrophy.Chinese medical journal · 2017Pooled it
- The burden, epidemiology, costs and treatment for Duchenne muscular dystrophy: an evidence review.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2017Pooled it
- Prevalence of neurogenetic disorders in the North of England.Neurology · 2015Pooled it
- Guideline
- Diagnostic approach to the congenital muscular dystrophies.Neuromuscular disorders : NMD · 2014Guideline
- Trial
- Treatment updates in myotonic disorders.Journal of neurology · 2026Review
- Article
- Genotype-phenotype relationship in a cohort of 131 Chinese patients with myotonic dystrophy type 1.BMC neurology · 2026Article
- 2nd NMD4C basic research summer school on promoting standardized protocols to advance translational research in neuromuscular disorders.Journal of neuromuscular diseases · 2026Article
- Neuromuscular Disorders in Children Through the Lens of Next-Generation Sequencing: A Study of Diagnostic Yield.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Role of hypertrophic adipocytes, collagen VI, and CD38 in adipose tissue fibrosis in obesity.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Epidemiology of Spinal Muscular Atrophy in Iceland: A Population-Based Study.Neuroepidemiology · 2026Article
- Modified Polycyclic Compounds Rescue Mis-splicing in Myotonic Dystrophy Type 1 Disease Models.ACS chemical biology · 2026Article
- Skipping the Biopsy: Real-World Experience of Whole-Exome Sequencing as First-Tier Testing in Pediatric Muscular Disorders.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Diagnostic Cut-off Values for Newly Developed Noninvasive Elastance-Based Indices in Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy-Associated Cardiomyopathy.Pediatric cardiology · 2026Article
- Incidence and Prevalence of Congenital Myopathies - A Population-Based Study From Western Sweden.Annals of neurology · 2026Article
174 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
We have performed a detailed population study of patients with genetic muscle disease in the northern region of England. Our current clinic population comprises over 1100 patients in whom we have molecularly characterized 31 separate muscle disease entities. Diagnostic clarity achieved through careful delineation of clinical features supported by histological, immunological and genetic analysis has allowed us to reach a definitive diagnosis in 75.7% of our patients. We have compared our case profile with that from Walton and Nattrass' seminal study from 1954, also of the northern region, together with data from other more recent studies from around the world. Point prevalence figures for each of the five major disease categories are comparable with those from other recent studies. Myotonic dystrophies are the most common, comprising 28.6% of our clinic population with a point prevalence of 10.6/100,000. Next most frequent are the dystrophinopathies and facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy making up 22.9% (8.46/100,000) and 10.7% (3.95/100,000) of the clinic population, respectively. Spinal muscular atrophy patients account for 5.1% or 1.87/100,000 patients. Limb girdle muscular dystrophy, which was described for the first time in the paper by Walton and Nattrass (1954) and comprised 17% of their clinic population, comprises 6.2% of our clinic population at a combined prevalence of 2.27/100,000. The clinic population included patients with 12 other muscle disorders. These disorders ranged from a point prevalence of 0.89/100 000 for the group of congenital muscular dystrophies to conditions with only two affected individuals in a population of three million. For the first time our study provides epidemiological information for X-linked Emery-Dreifuss muscular dystrophy and the collagen VI disorders. Each of the X-linked form of Emery-Dreifuss muscular dystrophy and Ullrich muscular dystrophy has a prevalence of 0.13/100,000, making both very rare. Bethlem myopathy was relatively more common with a prevalence of 0.77/100,000. Overall our study provides comprehensive epidemiological information on individually rare inherited neuromuscular conditions in Northern England. Despite the deliberate exclusion of relatively common groups such as hereditary motor and sensory neuropathy (40/100,000) and mitochondrial disorders (9.2/100,000), the combined prevalence is 37.0/100,000, demonstrating that these disorders, taken as a group, encompass a significant proportion of patients with chronic disease. The study also illustrates the immense diagnostic progress since the first regional survey over 50 years ago by Walton and Nattrass.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.