Trial reportLancet (London, England)2009
Oestrogen plus progestin and lung cancer in postmenopausal women (Women's Health Initiative trial): a post-hoc analysis of a randomised controlled trial.
Trial report in Lancet (London, England), 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 137 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Women's Health Initiative (WHI)
Low Dose Computed Tomography Screening Study in Non-smokers with Risk Factors for Lung Cancer in Taiwan
Red clover extract (promensil) and lifestyle changes to contrast menopausal symptoms in premenopausal women with hormone-sensitive breast cancer receiving adjuvant anti-estrogen therapy
Who cites it
137 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 322 citations in OpenAlex.
- Reproductive factors and lung cancer risk: a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC public health · 2020Pooled it
- Survivorship, Version 2.2017, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology.Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network : JNCCN · 2017Guideline
- Long-term hormone therapy for perimenopausal and postmenopausal women.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017Pooled it
- Hormone replacement therapy in females can decrease the risk of lung cancer: a meta-analysis.PloS one · 2013Pooled it
- Soy food intake and risk of lung cancer: evidence from the Shanghai Women's Health Study and a meta-analysis.American journal of epidemiology · 2012Pooled it
- The 2012 hormone therapy position statement of: The North American Menopause Society.Menopause (New York, N.Y.) · 2012Guideline
- Lung cancer screening.Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network : JNCCN · 2012Guideline
- Randomized phase II study of fulvestrant and erlotinib compared with erlotinib alone in patients with advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer.Lung cancer (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2018Trial
- Estrogen Plus Progestin and Lung Cancer: Follow-up of the Women's Health Initiative Randomized Trial.Clinical lung cancer · 2016Trial
- Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drug and Aspirin Use in Relation to Lung Cancer Risk among Postmenopausal Women.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2015Trial
- Trial
- Estrogen plus progestin and breast cancer incidence and mortality in postmenopausal women.JAMA · 2010Trial
- Lung cancer among postmenopausal women treated with estrogen alone in the women's health initiative randomized trial.Journal of the National Cancer Institute · 2010Trial
- Dose-Dependent Cytotoxic Effects of Lavandula angustifolia L. Oil on A549 Human Lung Carcinoma Cells.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2026Article
- Sex Differences in Cancer Immunotherapy-Clinical Evidence and Mechanisms With a Focus on NSCLC.Immunological reviews · 2026Review
- Sex Differences in Lung Immunity.Immunological reviews · 2026Review
- Lung cancer in non-smoking women (LCINSW): from risk factors to precision therapy.Cancer metastasis reviews · 2025Review
- Lung Cancer Prevention Among Appalachian Kentucky Women: A Community-Engaged Mixed Method Study.American journal of health promotion : AJHP · 2025Article
- Transcription factors and hormone receptors: Sex‑specific targets for cancer therapy (Review).Oncology letters · 2025Review
- Sex-based differences in lung cancer susceptibility and molecular genetics in the 2020s.Heliyon · 2025Article
77 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
17 authors at 12 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIn the post-intervention period of the Women's Health Initiative (WHI) trial, women assigned to treatment with oestrogen plus progestin had a higher risk of cancer than did those assigned to placebo. Results also suggested that the combined hormone therapy might increase mortality from lung cancer. To assess whether such an association exists, we undertook a post-hoc analysis of lung cancers diagnosed in the trial over the entire follow-up period.
methodsThe WHI study was a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial undertaken in 40 centres in the USA. 16 608 postmenopausal women aged 50-79 years with an intact uterus were randomly assigned by a computerised, stratified, permuted block algorithm to receive a once-daily tablet of 0.625 mg conjugated equine oestrogen plus 2.5 mg medroxyprogesterone acetate (n=8506) or matching placebo (n=8102). We assessed incidence and mortality rates for all lung cancer, small-cell lung cancer, and non-small-cell lung cancer by use of data from treatment and post-intervention follow-up periods. Analysis was by intention to treat. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00000611.
findingsAfter a mean of 5.6 years (SD 1.3) of treatment and 2.4 years (0.4) of additional follow-up, 109 women in the combined hormone therapy group had been diagnosed with lung cancer compared with 85 in the placebo group (incidence per year 0.16%vs 0.13%; hazard ratio [HR] 1.23, 95% CI 0.92-1.63, p=0.16). 96 women assigned to combined therapy had non-small-cell lung cancer compared with 72 assigned to placebo (0.14%vs 0.11%; HR 1.28, 0.94-1.73, p=0.12). More women died from lung cancer in the combined hormone therapy group than in the placebo group (73 vs 40 deaths; 0.11%vs 0.06%; HR 1.71, 1.16-2.52, p=0.01), mainly as a result of a higher number of deaths from non-small-cell lung cancer in the combined therapy group (62 vs 31 deaths; 0.09%vs 0.05%; HR 1.87, 1.22-2.88, p=0.004). Incidence and mortality rates of small-cell lung cancer were similar between groups.
interpretationAlthough treatment with oestrogen plus progestin in postmenopausal women did not increase incidence of lung cancer, it increased the number of deaths from lung cancer, in particular deaths from non-small-cell lung cancer. These findings should be incorporated into risk-benefit discussions with women considering combined hormone therapy, especially those with a high risk of lung cancer.
fundingNational Heart, Lung and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.