Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19766734›Full record

Trial reportContemporary clinical trials2010

Trial design: The St. Jude Children's Research Hospital Cancer Survivors Tobacco Quit Line study.

Taghrid Asfar, Robert C Klesges, Stacy D Sanford, Deborah Sherrill-Mittleman, Leslie L Robison, Melissa M Hudson, Grant Somes, James M Boyett, Harry Lando

Abstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Contemporary clinical trials, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Telephone counselling for smoking cessation.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Health Behaviors of Childhood Cancer Survivors.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2014
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Taghrid AsfarDepartment of Epidemiology and Cancer Control, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN 38105, USA. taghrid.asfar@stjude.org
Robert C Klesges
Stacy D Sanford
Deborah Sherrill-Mittleman
Leslie L Robison
Melissa M Hudson
Grant Somes
James M Boyett
Harry Lando
St. Jude Children's Research Hospital · USUniversity of Tennessee Health Science Center · USNorthwestern University · USUniversity of Minnesota · US

Funding

Efficacy of a Tobacco Quit Line for Childhood Cancer SurvivorsR01CA127964 · NCI · ST. JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL · PI KLESGES, ROBERT C · 2008 to 2012
$3.1M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA127964NCI NIH HHS R01CA127964-01A1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nearly, one-fifth of childhood cancer survivors (CCSs) smoke cigarettes. Because CCSs are already at greater medical smoking-related risks, targeting them for smoking cessation efforts is a high priority. One of the major challenges with smoking cessation in CCSs is how to reach such a geographically dispersed population. This study aims to demonstrate that these challenges can be overcome through the use of telephone-based tobacco quit lines (QLs). This report describes the design of the St. Jude Cancer Survivor Tobacco QL study, which is a randomized controlled clinical trial that will examine the long-term (1-year) efficacy of a counselor initiated vs. participant initiated tobacco QL with adjunctive nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) in both groups. Participants (N=950) will be recruited nationally and randomly assigned to one of the two interventions. The counselor initiated intervention includes six scheduled telephone sessions of a behavioral intervention and provision of 8 weeks of NRT. The participant initiated intervention allows the participant to call the QL at their convenience, but includes the same six telephone sessions and provision of 2 weeks of NRT. Both groups will receive two follow-up phone calls at 8 weeks and 1 year after enrollment to assess their smoking status. The primary outcome measure is cotinine-validated self-reported smoking abstinence at 1-year follow-up. Results from this study will provide the first evidence about the efficacy of intensive QL cessation intervention in this high-risk population. Such evidence can lead as well to the dissemination of this intervention to other medically compromised populations.

Indexed as

HotlinesResearch DesignSmoking CessationSurvivorsAdultBehavior TherapyChildCounselingFemaleGanglionic StimulantsHumansMaleNeoplasmsNicotinePatient SelectionYoung AdultGanglionic StimulantsNicotine

Identifiers

PMID19766734
PMCPMC2818168
OpenAlexW2034388943

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.