Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19766564›Full record

ArticleCell2009

Molecular architecture of the Mos1 paired-end complex: the structural basis of DNA transposition in a eukaryote.

Julia M Richardson, Sean D Colloms, David J Finnegan, Malcolm D Walkinshaw

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cell, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 97 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
97citing papers in PubMed
14.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

97 citing papers in PubMed, 146 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. A novel hyperactive variant of theMolecular therapy. Nucleic acids · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Structure and function of retroviral integrase.Nature reviews. Microbiology · 2022
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Jumping Ahead withViruses · 2021
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

37 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Julia M RichardsonSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland. jrichard@staffmail.ed.ac.uk
Sean D Colloms
David J Finnegan
Malcolm D Walkinshaw
University of Edinburgh · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council G0301082Wellcome Trust 085176
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A key step in cut-and-paste DNA transposition is the pairing of transposon ends before the element is excised and inserted at a new site in its host genome. Crystallographic analyses of the paired-end complex (PEC) formed from precleaved transposon ends and the transposase of the eukaryotic element Mos1 reveals two parallel ends bound to a dimeric enzyme. The complex has a trans arrangement, with each transposon end recognized by the DNA binding region of one transposase monomer and by the active site of the other monomer. Two additional DNA duplexes in the crystal indicate likely binding sites for flanking DNA. Biochemical data provide support for a model of the target capture complex and identify Arg186 to be critical for target binding. Mixing experiments indicate that a transposase dimer initiates first-strand cleavage and suggest a pathway for PEC formation.

Indexed as

DNA Transposable ElementsAnimalsCatalytic DomainCrystallography, X-RayDNA-Binding ProteinsDrosophilaModels, MolecularProtein Structure, TertiaryTransposasesX-Ray DiffractionDNA-Binding ProteinsDNA Transposable Elementsmariner transposasesTransposases

Identifiers

PMID19766564
PMCPMC3977044
OpenAlexW2026862785

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.