Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19765790›Full record

ArticleVirology2009

Characterization of human adenovirus serotypes 5, 6, 11, and 35 as anticancer agents.

Elena V Shashkova, Shannon M May, Michael A Barry

Abstract readComparative StudyEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Virology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed, 72 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. HDAd6/35++ - A new helper-dependent adenovirus vector platform forMolecular therapy. Methods & clinical development · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Elena V ShashkovaDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55902, USA.
Shannon M May
Michael A Barry
Mayo Clinic · US

Funding

Utility of serum and Tissue Biomarkers for Predicting Response to Androgen DeprivP50CA091956 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI TINDALL, DONALD J. · 2001 to 2010
$23.4M
NCI NIH HHS P50 CA091956NCI NIH HHS P50 CA91956
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human adenovirus type 5 (Ad5) has been the most popular platform for the development of oncolytic Ads. Alternative Ad serotypes with low seroprevalence might allow for improved anticancer efficacy in Ad5-immune patients. We studied the safety and efficacy of rare serotypes Ad6, Ad11 and Ad35. In vitro cytotoxicity of the Ads correlated with expression of CAR and CD46 in most but not all cell lines. Among CAR-binding viruses, Ad5 was often more active than Ad6, among CD46-binding viruses Ad35 was generally more cytotoxic than Ad11 in cell culture studies. Ad5, Ad6, and Ad11 demonstrated similar anticancer activity in vivo, whereas Ad35 was not efficacious. Hepatotoxicity developed only in Ad5-injected mice. Predosing with Ad11 and Ad35 did not increase infection of hepatocytes with Ad5-based vector demonstrating different interaction of these Ads with Kupffer cells. Data obtained in this study suggest developing Ad6 and Ad11 as alternative Ads for anticancer treatment.

Indexed as

Adenoviruses, HumanAnimalsBreast NeoplasmsCarcinoma, HepatocellularCell LineCell Line, TumorFemaleHepatocytesHumansKupffer CellsLiver NeoplasmsMaleMembrane Cofactor ProteinMiceMice, Inbred C57BLMice, Inbred ICRCD46 protein, humanMembrane Cofactor ProteinRCVRN protein, humanReceptors, VirusRecoverin

Identifiers

PMID19765790
PMCPMC2784171
OpenAlexW1992351692

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.