Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19765664›Full record

ReviewSeminars in cell & developmental biology2009

Scratching the niche that controls Caenorhabditis elegans germline stem cells.

Dana T Byrd, Judith Kimble

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Seminars in cell & developmental biology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Linking tissue morphology and tissue healing in a cell-fate model.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Fexinidazole and Corallopyronin A targetbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Neuronal regulatedeLife · 2021
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Dana T ByrdDepartment of Biochemistry and Howard Hughes Medical Institute, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 433 Babcock Drive, Madison, WI 53706-1544, USA. dbyrd@wisc.edu
Judith Kimble

Funding

REGULATION OF GERMLINE STEM CELLS IN C. ELEGANSF32GM072126 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI BYRD, DANA · 2004 to 2007
$142k
Howard Hughes Medical InstituteNIGMS NIH HHS F32 GM072126
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Caenorhabditis elegans gonad provides a well-defined model for a stem cell niche and its control of self-renewal and differentiation. The distal tip cell (DTC) forms a mesenchymal niche that controls germline stem cells (GSCs), both to generate the germline tissue during development and to maintain it during adulthood. The DTC uses GLP-1/Notch signaling to regulate GSCs; germ cells respond to Notch signaling with a network of RNA regulators to control the decision between self-renewal and entry into the meiotic cell cycle.

Indexed as

AnimalsCaenorhabditis elegansCell DifferentiationCell LineageFemaleGene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalGerm CellsMaleMeiosisModels, BiologicalReceptors, NotchRNARNA-Binding ProteinsSignal TransductionStem CellsReceptors, NotchRNARNA-Binding Proteins

Identifiers

PMID19765664
PMCPMC2820558

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.