ArticleAmerican journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons2009
Subgroup analyses in randomized controlled trials: the need for risk stratification in kidney transplantation.
Article in American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Mycophenolic acid versus azathioprine as primary immunosuppression for kidney transplant recipients.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2015Pooled it
- Massage for low-back pain.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2015Pooled it
- A Preliminary Analysis of Individuals With Serious Mental Illness and Comorbid Diabetes.Archives of psychiatric nursing · 2016Trial
- Identification of effect modifiers using a stratified Mendelian randomization algorithmic framework.European journal of epidemiology · 2025Article
- The Likely Underestimated Impact of Lifestyle Intervention: Diabetes Prevention Program Translation Examples.American journal of preventive medicine · 2022Article
- Complement-Binding Donor-Specific Anti-HLA Antibodies: Biomarker for Immunologic Risk Stratification in Pediatric Kidney Transplantation Recipients.Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation · 2022Article
- Autophagy in kidney transplants of sirolimus treated recipients.Journal of nephropathology · 2017Article
- Value of Donor-Specific Anti-HLA Antibody Monitoring and Characterization for Risk Stratification of Kidney Allograft Loss.Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN · 2017Article
- From Humoral Theory to Performant Risk Stratification in Kidney Transplantation.Journal of immunology research · 2017Review
- LEADER 7: cardiovascular risk profiles of US and European participants in the LEADER diabetes trial differ.Diabetology & metabolic syndrome · 2016 · on this mapArticle
- Risk Stratification for Rejection and Infection after Kidney Transplantation.Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN · 2015Article
- Predictability of persistent frequent attendance in primary care: a temporal and geographical validation study.PloS one · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Although randomized controlled trials (RCT) are the gold standard for establishing causation in clinical research, their aggregated results can be misleading when applied to individual patients. A treatment may be beneficial in some patients, but its harms may outweigh benefits in others. While conventional one-variable-at-a-time subgroup analyses have well-known limitations, multivariable risk-based analyses can help uncover clinically significant heterogeneity in treatment effects that may be otherwise obscured. Trials in kidney transplantation have yielded the finding that a reduction in acute rejection does not translate into a similar benefit in prolonging graft survival and improving graft function. This paradox might be explained by the variation in risk for acute rejection among included kidney transplant recipients varying the likelihood of benefit or harm from intense immunosuppressive regimens. Analyses that stratify patients by their immunological risk may resolve these otherwise puzzling results. Reliable risk models should be developed to investigate benefits and harms in rationally designed risk-based subgroups of patients in existing RCT data sets. These risk strata would need to be validated in future prospective clinical trials examining long-term effects on patient and graft survival. This approach may allow better individualized treatment choices for kidney transplant recipients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.