Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19764948›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons2009

Subgroup analyses in randomized controlled trials: the need for risk stratification in kidney transplantation.

M Wagner, E M Balk, D M Kent, B L Kasiske, H Ekberg

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Massage for low-back pain.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2015
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Complement-Binding Donor-Specific Anti-HLA Antibodies: Biomarker for Immunologic Risk Stratification in Pediatric Kidney Transplantation Recipients.Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Risk Stratification for Rejection and Infection after Kidney Transplantation.Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN · 2015
    Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

M WagnerDepartment of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA. wagner_m@klinik.uni-wuerzburg.de
E M Balk
D M Kent
B L Kasiske
H Ekberg

Funding

TUFTS CLINICAL AND TRANSLATION SCIENCE INSTITUTE (UL1): BPCAUL1RR025752 · NCRR · TUFTS UNIVERSITY BOSTON · PI SELKER, HARRY P. · 2008 to 2011
$17.6M
NCRR NIH HHS IUL1 RR025752NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR025752
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although randomized controlled trials (RCT) are the gold standard for establishing causation in clinical research, their aggregated results can be misleading when applied to individual patients. A treatment may be beneficial in some patients, but its harms may outweigh benefits in others. While conventional one-variable-at-a-time subgroup analyses have well-known limitations, multivariable risk-based analyses can help uncover clinically significant heterogeneity in treatment effects that may be otherwise obscured. Trials in kidney transplantation have yielded the finding that a reduction in acute rejection does not translate into a similar benefit in prolonging graft survival and improving graft function. This paradox might be explained by the variation in risk for acute rejection among included kidney transplant recipients varying the likelihood of benefit or harm from intense immunosuppressive regimens. Analyses that stratify patients by their immunological risk may resolve these otherwise puzzling results. Reliable risk models should be developed to investigate benefits and harms in rationally designed risk-based subgroups of patients in existing RCT data sets. These risk strata would need to be validated in future prospective clinical trials examining long-term effects on patient and graft survival. This approach may allow better individualized treatment choices for kidney transplant recipients.

Indexed as

Kidney TransplantationRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicGraft RejectionHumansMultivariate AnalysisRiskTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID19764948
PMCPMC2997518

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.