ReviewWorld journal of urology2010
New therapies for non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer.
Review in World journal of urology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Local Immune Stimulation by Intravesical Instillation of Baculovirus to Enable Bladder Cancer Therapy.Scientific reports · 2016Article
- Reactive oxygen species-mediated therapeutic control of bladder cancer.Nature reviews. Urology · 2011Review
- External validation and applicability of the EORTC risk tables for non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer.World journal of urology · 2011Article
- Contemporary management of patients with high-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer who fail intravesical BCG therapy.World journal of urology · 2011Review
- RNAi-based therapeutics targeting survivin and PLK1 for treatment of bladder cancer.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2011Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The treatment of non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) remains a challenge owing to its increased tendency to recur and the possibility of progression to potentially dangerous muscle-invasive disease. Treatment outcomes by current therapeutic modalities are still not optimal. In recent years, there have been a number of substantive advances in the therapeutic options for the management of NMIBC. New chemotherapeutic drugs have been introduced, along with efforts made to improve the efficacy of existing agents and enhance delivery of agents to the bladder. There is also a growing trend toward combination of agents and multimodal therapy. Also of considerable interest are the investigation of newer approaches such as gene therapy, chemoenhancement and newer forms of immunotherapy. Here, we review the recent pre-clinical and clinical developments in the treatment of NMIBC, described in the broad categories of immunotherapy, chemotherapeutic agents, improved or device-assisted agent delivery and gene therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
19763584What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.