ReviewSeminars in immunopathology2009
Novel approaches for identifying target antigens of autoreactive human B and T cells.
Review in Seminars in immunopathology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- T cell antigenic recognition sequencing (TAR-seq) enables precise characterization of vaccine-elicited cellular immunity ex vivo andFrontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- Identification and Characterization of Antigen-Specific CD8Journal of immunology (Baltimore, Md. : 1950) · 2021Article
- Dendritic cells, T cells and their interaction in rheumatoid arthritis.Clinical and experimental immunology · 2019Review
- Computational Model Reveals Limited Correlation between Germinal Center B-Cell Subclone Abundancy and Affinity: Implications for Repertoire Sequencing.Frontiers in immunology · 2017Article
- A circulating reservoir of pathogenic-like CD4+ T cells shares a genetic and phenotypic signature with the inflamed synovial micro-environment.Annals of the rheumatic diseases · 2016Article
- Expanded CD8 T-cell sharing between periphery and CNS in multiple sclerosis.Annals of clinical and translational neurology · 2015Article
- Autoantibody profiling in multiple sclerosis using arrays of human protein fragments.Molecular & cellular proteomics : MCP · 2013Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Antigen-specific immune responses in multiple sclerosis have been studied for decades, but the target antigens of the putatively autoaggressive B and T cells still remain elusive. Here, we summarize recent strategies which are based on the direct analysis of biopsy or autopsy specimens from patients. Since this material is extremely scarce, the experimental methods need to be exceptionally sensitive. We describe technologies to distinguish (auto) aggressive T cells from irrelevant bystander lymphocytes by analyzing clonal expansions in relation to the morphological location of the cells in the tissue lesions. We then discuss approaches to clone matching alpha- and beta-chains of the antigen-specific T cell receptor (TCR) molecules from single T cells. This is necessary because usually, several clones are expanded and are diluted by many irrelevant cells. The matching TCR chains from individual T cells can be resurrected in hybridoma cells which may then be used for antigen searches. We discuss strategies to identify antigens of gammadelta- and alphabeta-TCR molecules, such as biochemical methods, candidate antigens, human leukocyte antigen requirements, synthetic peptide, and cDNA libraries. These strategies are tailored to characterize the antigens of the membrane-anchored, low-affinity TCR molecules. The strategies to identify (auto) reactive B cells or immunoglobulin (Ig) molecules are fundamentally different, because Ig molecules are water-soluble and have high affinities. We further discuss proteome-based approaches, techniques that analyze Ig-chains from single B cells, and a repertoire-based method that compares Ig-proteomes and Ig-transcriptomes. The first method detects Ig antigens directly, whereas the latter two methods allow reconstruction of Ig molecules, which can be used for antigen searches.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.