ArticleNature reviews. Genetics2009
The expansion of newborn screening: is reproductive benefit an appropriate pursuit?
Article in Nature reviews. Genetics, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Reconsidering reproductive benefit through newborn screening: a systematic review of guidelines on preconception, prenatal and newborn screening.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2010Pooled it
- Cascade counselling and testing. Recommendations of the European Society of Human Genetics.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2026Article
- "The ability to get ahead": Australian parent perspectives on genomics in newborn screening and considerations for potential models of care.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2025Article
- Expanding the Australian Newborn Blood Spot Screening Program using genomic sequencing: do we want it and are we ready?European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2023Article
- The promise of public health ethics for precision medicine: the case of newborn preventive genomic sequencing.Human genetics · 2022Review
- Primary care provider perspectives on using genomic sequencing in the care of healthy children.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2020Article
- Ethics in genetic counselling.Journal of community genetics · 2019Review
- Newborn genetic screening for spinal muscular atrophy in the UK: The views of the general population.Molecular genetics & genomic medicine · 2018Article
- A secondary benefit: the reproductive impact of carrier results from newborn screening for cystic fibrosis.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2017Article
- Genomic newborn screening: public health policy considerations and recommendations.BMC medical genomics · 2017Article
- Points to Consider: Ethical, Legal, and Psychosocial Implications of Genetic Testing in Children and Adolescents.American journal of human genetics · 2015Review
- Reflecting on earlier experiences with unsolicited findings: points to consider for next-generation sequencing and informed consent in diagnostics.Human mutation · 2013Review
- Health-care providers' views on pursuing reproductive benefit through newborn screening: the case of sickle cell disorders.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2012Article
- Reply to Ross' commentary: Reproductive benefit through newborn screening: preferences, policy and ethics.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2012Article
- A question of benefit.Nature genetics · 2010Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
19763150What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.