Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19761761›Full record

ArticleBrain research2009

The impact of adenosine and an A2A adenosine receptor agonist on the ACh-induced increase in intracellular calcium of the glomus cells of the cat carotid body.

Robert S Fitzgerald, Machiko Shirahata, Irene Chang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain research, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 45% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Adenosine A₂a receptors and O₂ sensing in development.American journal of physiology. Regulatory, integrative and comparative physiology · 2011
    Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Robert S FitzgeraldDepartment of Environmental Health Sciences, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA. rfitzger@jhsph.edu
Machiko Shirahata
Irene Chang
Johns Hopkins University · USJohns Hopkins Medicine · US

Funding

CHEMOTRANSDUCTION IN THE CAROTID BODYR01HL050712 · NHLBI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI FITZGERALD, ROBERT SCHAEFER · 1993 to 2007
$2.7M
CAROTID BODY EXCITATION--NEW CONCEPTR01HL061596 · NHLBI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI SHIRAHATA, MACHIKO · 1999 to 2002
$724k
NHLBI NIH HHS HL 50712NHLBI NIH HHS HL 61596NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL050712NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL061596
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The carotid body (CB) is a polymodal chemosensor of arterial blood located next to the internal carotid artery. The basic chemosensing unit is composed of the neurotransmitter (NT)-containing glomus cells (GCs) and the sensory afferent fibers synapsing onto the GCs. Nicotinic and muscarinic receptors have been found on both the sensory afferent fibers and on the GCs. Neural output from the CB (CBNO) increases when arterial blood perfusing it is hypoxic, hypoglycemic, hypercapnic, or acidic. The increased CBNO due to GC release of excitatory NTs must be preceded by an entrance of calcium into the GCs. With repeated release of ACh from the GCs, cholinergic receptors could become desensitized, particularly nicotinic receptors which function as calcium channels. The purpose of the present study was to see if adenosine (ADO), known to alter receptor sensitivities, could attenuate or eliminate any desensitization of the nicotinic receptors occurring during the repeated application of ACh. Cat CBs were harvested with techniques approved by the University's Animal Care/Use Committee. The GCs were cultured and prepared for detecting [Ca(++)](i) with standard techniques. Repeated application of ACh produced a progressively decreasing increase in [Ca(++)](i). With the use of ADO or an A2(A) ADO receptor agonist the decrease was avoided. Though ADO also increased GC [Ca(++)](i), the sum of ADO increase and ACh increase, when superfused separately, was less than the increase when they were both included in the same superfusion. This suggested the possible involvement of a new path in the action. Potential mechanisms to explain the phenomena are discussed.

Indexed as

AcetylcholineAdenosineAnimalsAntihypertensive AgentsCalciumCarotid BodyCatsCells, CulturedFemaleFluorescent DyesImmunohistochemistryMaleMicroscopy, FluorescenceNeuronsPhenethylaminesReceptor, Adenosine A2A1,3-dipropyl-8-cyclopentylxanthine2-(4-(2-carboxyethyl)phenethylamino)-5'-N-ethylcarboxamidoadenosineAcetylcholineAdenosineAntihypertensive AgentsCalciumFluorescent DyesPhenethylaminesReceptor, Adenosine A2AReceptors, MuscarinicReceptors, NicotinicVasodilator AgentsXanthines

Identifiers

PMID19761761
PMCPMC2783842
OpenAlexW2018692755

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.