Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19761658›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners2009

'A coal face option': GPs' perspectives on the rise in antidepressant prescribing.

Sara Macdonald, Jill Morrison, Margaret Maxwell, Rosalia Munoz-Arroyo, Andrew Power, Michael Smith, Matt Sutton, Philip Wilson

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Delivering a primary care-based social prescribing initiative: a qualitative study of the benefits and challenges.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2018
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Explaining the variation between practices in the duration of new antidepressant treatment: a database cohort study in primary care.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2015
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. What is depression? Psychiatrists' and GPs' experiences of diagnosis and the diagnostic process.International journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being · 2014
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Factors associated with duration of new antidepressant treatment: analysis of a large primary care database.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2012
    Article
  15. Can a self-referral system help improve access to psychological treatments?The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2010
    Article
  16. Why do GPs prescribe psychotropic drugs when they would rather provide alternative psychological interventions?The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2010
    Article
  17. Reasons to be cheerful? Reflections on GPs' responses to depression.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2009
    Article
  18. Appropriateness of antidepressant prescribing: an observational study in a Scottish primary-care setting.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2009
    Article
  19. Improving access to psychological therapies: implications for mental health care in general practice.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2009
    Article
  20. Commentary: GPs' views on their handling of depression.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2009
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Sara MacdonaldSection of General Practice and Primary Care, Division of Community Based Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G129LX, UK. s.macdonald@clinmed.gla.ac.uk
Jill Morrison
Margaret Maxwell
Rosalia Munoz-Arroyo
Andrew Power
Michael Smith
Matt Sutton
Philip Wilson

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLevels of antidepressant prescribing have dramatically increased in Western countries in the last two decades.

aimTo explore GPs' views about, and explanations for, the increase in antidepressant prescribing in Scotland between 1995 and 2004.

designQualitative, interview study.

settingGeneral practices, Scotland.

participantsGPs in 30 practices (n = 63) purposively selected to reflect a range of practice characteristics and levels of antidepressant prescribing.

methodInterviews with GPs were taped and transcribed. Analysis followed a Framework Approach.

resultsGPs offered a range of explanations for the rise in antidepressant prescribing in Scotland. Few doctors thought that the incidence of depression had increased, and many questioned the appropriateness of current levels of prescribing. A number of related factors were considered to have contributed to the increase. These included: the success of campaigns to raise awareness of depression; a willingness among patients to seek help; and the perceived safety of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, making it easier for GPs to manage depression in primary care. Many GPs believed that unhappiness, exacerbated by social deprivation and the breakdown of traditional social structures, was being 'medicalised' inappropriately.

conclusionMost antidepressant prescriptions in Scotland are issued by GPs, and current policy aims to reduce levels of prescribing. To meet this aim, GPs' prescribing behaviour needs to change. The findings suggest that GPs see themselves as responders to, rather than facilitators of, change and this has obvious implications for initiatives to reduce prescribing.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelPractice Patterns, Physicians'Antidepressive AgentsDecision MakingDepressive DisorderFamily PracticeFemaleHumansMalePhysician's RoleScotlandSelective Serotonin Reuptake InhibitorsAntidepressive AgentsSelective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID19761658
PMCPMC2734377

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.