Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19761573›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2009

Network analysis of genes regulated in renal diseases: implications for a molecular-based classification.

Suresh K Bhavnani, Felix Eichinger, Sebastian Martini, Paul Saxman, H V Jagadish, Matthias Kretzler

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Subtyping Social Determinants of Health inmedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2023
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Systems biology of kidney diseases.Kidney international · 2012
    Review
  8. Formal concept analysis of disease similarity.AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science · 2012
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Suresh K BhavnaniCenter for Computational Medicine & Bioinformatics, 24 Frank Lloyd Wright Dr, Domino's Farm, Lobby L, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-0738, USA. bhavnani@umich.edu
Felix Eichinger
Sebastian Martini
Paul Saxman
H V Jagadish
Matthias Kretzler
Institute of Bioinformatics · INUniversity of Michigan–Ann Arbor · USMichigan United · USState Street (United States) · US

Funding

MICHIGAN INSTITUTE FOR CLINICAL AND HEALTH RESEARCH (MICHR) (UL1): (BPCA)UL1RR024986 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI SHANLEY, THOMAS P. · 2007 to 2011
$51.2M
Nation Center- Integrative Biomedical Informatics(RMI)U54DA021519 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI ATHEY, BRIAN DAVID · 2005 to 2010
$21.3M
University of Michigan O'Brien Kidney Translational Core CenterP30DK081943 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI PENNATHUR, SUBRAMANIAM · 2008 to 2022
$12.9M
Molecular Progression Predictors in the Chronic Renal Insufficiency CohortR01DK079912 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI KRETZLER, MATTHIAS · 2008 to 2012
$2.8M
NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR024986NCRR NIH HHS UL1RR024986NIDA NIH HHS U54 DA021519NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK081943NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK079912
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChronic renal diseases are currently classified based on morphological similarities such as whether they produce predominantly inflammatory or non-inflammatory responses. However, such classifications do not reliably predict the course of the disease and its response to therapy. In contrast, recent studies in diseases such as breast cancer suggest that a classification which includes molecular information could lead to more accurate diagnoses and prediction of treatment response. This article describes how we extracted gene expression profiles from biopsies of patients with chronic renal diseases, and used network visualizations and associated quantitative measures to rapidly analyze similarities and differences between the diseases.

resultsThe analysis revealed three main regularities: (1) Many genes associated with a single disease, and fewer genes associated with many diseases. (2) Unexpected combinations of renal diseases that share relatively large numbers of genes. (3) Uniform concordance in the regulation of all genes in the network.

conclusionThe overall results suggest the need to define a molecular-based classification of renal diseases, in addition to hypotheses for the unexpected patterns of shared genes and the uniformity in gene concordance. Furthermore, the results demonstrate the utility of network analyses to rapidly understand complex relationships between diseases and regulated genes.

Indexed as

Gene Regulatory NetworksComputational BiologyGene Expression ProfilingHumansKidney DiseasesOligonucleotide Array Sequence Analysis

Identifiers

PMID19761573
PMCPMC2745690
OpenAlexW1967173952

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.