Trial reportDrugs & aging2009
Sedative load and mortality among residents of long-term care facilities: a prospective cohort study.
Trial report in Drugs & aging, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.
- Definition and Measurement of Physical and Chemical Restraint in Long-Term Care: A Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Pooled it
- Tools for Assessment of the Appropriateness of Prescribing and Association with Patient-Related Outcomes: A Systematic Review.Drugs & aging · 2018Pooled it
- Associations between drug burden index and mortality in older people in residential aged care facilities.Drugs & aging · 2012Trial
- Identifying predictors and measuring variation in hospitalisation for older adult care home residents: a retrospective cohort study using routinely collected data.Age and ageing · 2026Article
- Identifying Predictors and Measuring Variation in Anticholinergic Burden and Sedative Load for Older Adult Care Home Residents: A Retrospective Cohort Study Using Routinely Collected Data.Pragmatic and observational research · 2026Article
- Change in sedative burden after dementia onset using difference-in-difference estimations.PloS one · 2019Article
- Analgesic Use and Daytime Sleepiness in Residents With and Without Dementia in Residential Aged Care Facilities.Drugs & aging · 2015Article
- Article
- Sedative load among community-dwelling people aged 75 years and older: a population-based study.Drugs & aging · 2011Article
- Sedative load of medications prescribed for older people with dementia in care homes.BMC geriatrics · 2011Article
- Concomitant use of SSRIs, NSAIDs/aspirin and gastroprotective drugs among residents of long-term care facilities: a medical record review.Clinical drug investigation · 2011Article
- Sedative load among long-term care facility residents with and without dementia: a cross-sectional study.Clinical drug investigation · 2010Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundOlder people are often prescribed multiple drugs with sedative properties. Most research has focused on specific classes of sedative and psychotropic drugs. The cumulative effect of taking multiple drugs with sedative properties has been termed 'sedative load'. Few previous studies have investigated the sedative load among residents of long-term care facilities. No previous studies have assessed the possible association between sedative load and mortality.
objectiveThe objective of this study was to describe the sedative load among residents of long-term care facilities, and to investigate a possible association between sedative load and mortality.
methodsThis was a prospective cohort study. The study population comprised all 1444 residents of 53 long-term care wards in seven hospitals in Helsinki during September 2003. Of the eligible residents, 1087 residents or their proxies provided written informed consent to participate. Medical, medication and follow-up mortality data were available for 1004 residents. The main outcome measures were sedative load and all-cause mortality.
resultsThe mean age of the residents was 81.3 (SD 10.9) years, and the mean number of regularly used drugs per resident was 7.1 (SD 3.4). Fifteen percent of residents were categorized as non-users of sedative drugs, 32% as users of some drugs with sedative properties and 53% as residents with a high sedative load. There was a bivariate association between having a higher sedative load and younger age (p < 0.001), male sex (p = 0.006), not being widowed (p = 0.001), diagnosis of depression (p < 0.001), diagnosis of psychiatric illness other than depression (p < 0.001), not being diagnosed with dementia (p = 0.009) and a shorter duration of institutional care (p = 0.02). Unadjusted analysis revealed that having a higher sedative load was associated with increased survival (p = 0.04, log rank test). However, in the adjusted Cox proportional hazard model, only poor nutritional status (hazard ratio [HR] 1.55; 95% CI 1.32, 1.82), male sex (HR 1.37; 95% CI 1.12, 1.69), increasing age (HR 1.04; 95% CI 1.03, 1.05) and co-morbidity (HR 1.07; 95% CI 1.02, 1.13) were significantly associated with risk of death.
conclusionsThere is a very high rate of sedative and psychotropic drug use among residents of long-term care facilities in Helsinki. However, having a high sedative load was not associated with an increased risk of death. Further research is needed to investigate the possible association between sedative load and mortality using alternative models and methods, and in different resident populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.