ArticlePloS one2009
Prodepth: predict residue depth by support vector regression approach from protein sequences only.
Article in PloS one, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 68 citations in OpenAlex.
- Recent Advances in Computational Prediction of Secondary and Supersecondary Structures from Protein Sequences.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2025Review
- Supercharged Phosphotriesterase for improved Paraoxon activity.Protein engineering, design & selection : PEDS · 2024Article
- Llamanade: An open-source computational pipeline for robust nanobody humanization.Structure (London, England : 1993) · 2022Article
- Article
- Early Diagnosis of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma by Combining Relative Expression Orderings With Machine-Learning Method.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2020Article
- iProt-Sub: a comprehensive package for accurately mapping and predicting protease-specific substrates and cleavage sites.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2019Review
- Nutrient transport suggests an evolutionary basis for charged archaeal surface layer proteins.The ISME journal · 2018Article
- Article
- Article
- Prediction of structural features and application to outer membrane protein identification.Scientific reports · 2015Article
- Article
- Predicting HIV-1 broadly neutralizing antibody epitope networks using neutralization titers and a novel computational method.BMC bioinformatics · 2014Article
- Adepth: New Representation and its implications for atomic depths of macromolecules.Nucleic acids research · 2013Article
- TANGLE: two-level support vector regression approach for protein backbone torsion angle prediction from primary sequences.PloS one · 2012Article
- Article
- PROSPER: an integrated feature-based tool for predicting protease substrate cleavage sites.PloS one · 2012Article
- DBAC: a simple prediction method for protein binding hot spots based on burial levels and deeply buried atomic contacts.BMC systems biology · 2011Article
- APIS: accurate prediction of hot spots in protein interfaces by combining protrusion index with solvent accessibility.BMC bioinformatics · 2010Article
- eMap 2.0: A Web-Based Platform for Identifying electron Transfer Pathways in Proteins and Protein Families.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Computational molecular scienceReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Residue depth (RD) is a solvent exposure measure that complements the information provided by conventional accessible surface area (ASA) and describes to what extent a residue is buried in the protein structure space. Previous studies have established that RD is correlated with several protein properties, such as protein stability, residue conservation and amino acid types. Accurate prediction of RD has many potentially important applications in the field of structural bioinformatics, for example, facilitating the identification of functionally important residues, or residues in the folding nucleus, or enzyme active sites from sequence information. In this work, we introduce an efficient approach that uses support vector regression to quantify the relationship between RD and protein sequence. We systematically investigated eight different sequence encoding schemes including both local and global sequence characteristics and examined their respective prediction performances. For the objective evaluation of our approach, we used 5-fold cross-validation to assess the prediction accuracies and showed that the overall best performance could be achieved with a correlation coefficient (CC) of 0.71 between the observed and predicted RD values and a root mean square error (RMSE) of 1.74, after incorporating the relevant multiple sequence features. The results suggest that residue depth could be reliably predicted solely from protein primary sequences: local sequence environments are the major determinants, while global sequence features could influence the prediction performance marginally. We highlight two examples as a comparison in order to illustrate the applicability of this approach. We also discuss the potential implications of this new structural parameter in the field of protein structure prediction and homology modeling. This method might prove to be a powerful tool for sequence analysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.