Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19759917›Full record

ArticlePloS one2009

Prodepth: predict residue depth by support vector regression approach from protein sequences only.

Jiangning Song, Hao Tan, Khalid Mahmood, Ruby H P Law, Ashley M Buckle, Geoffrey I Webb, Tatsuya Akutsu, James C Whisstock

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 68 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Supercharged Phosphotriesterase for improved Paraoxon activity.Protein engineering, design & selection : PEDS · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2021
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Jiangning SongDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Monash University, Clayton, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia. Jiangning.Song@med.monash.edu.au
Hao Tan
Khalid Mahmood
Ruby H P Law
Ashley M Buckle
Geoffrey I Webb
Tatsuya Akutsu
James C Whisstock
Monash University · AUKyoto University · JPKyoto University Institute for Chemical Research

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Residue depth (RD) is a solvent exposure measure that complements the information provided by conventional accessible surface area (ASA) and describes to what extent a residue is buried in the protein structure space. Previous studies have established that RD is correlated with several protein properties, such as protein stability, residue conservation and amino acid types. Accurate prediction of RD has many potentially important applications in the field of structural bioinformatics, for example, facilitating the identification of functionally important residues, or residues in the folding nucleus, or enzyme active sites from sequence information. In this work, we introduce an efficient approach that uses support vector regression to quantify the relationship between RD and protein sequence. We systematically investigated eight different sequence encoding schemes including both local and global sequence characteristics and examined their respective prediction performances. For the objective evaluation of our approach, we used 5-fold cross-validation to assess the prediction accuracies and showed that the overall best performance could be achieved with a correlation coefficient (CC) of 0.71 between the observed and predicted RD values and a root mean square error (RMSE) of 1.74, after incorporating the relevant multiple sequence features. The results suggest that residue depth could be reliably predicted solely from protein primary sequences: local sequence environments are the major determinants, while global sequence features could influence the prediction performance marginally. We highlight two examples as a comparison in order to illustrate the applicability of this approach. We also discuss the potential implications of this new structural parameter in the field of protein structure prediction and homology modeling. This method might prove to be a powerful tool for sequence analysis.

Indexed as

SoftwareAnimalsCarboxylic Ester HydrolasesComputational BiologyEscherichia coliHumansProteinsProtein Structure, SecondaryProteomicsRegression AnalysisReproducibility of ResultsROC CurveSequence AlignmentSequence Analysis, ProteinSolventsaminoacyl-tRNA hydrolaseCarboxylic Ester HydrolasesProteinsSolvents

Identifiers

PMID19759917
PMCPMC2742725
OpenAlexW2087197916

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.