ArticleBioinformation2009
Study of codon bias perspective of fungal xylanase gene by multivariate analysis.
Article in Bioinformation, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Characterization, cloning and functional expression of novel xylanase from Thermomyces lanuginosus SS-8 isolated from self-heating plant wreckage material.World journal of microbiology & biotechnology · 2013Article
- Purification and preliminary characterization of a xylanase from Thermomyces lanuginosus strain SS-8.3 Biotech · 2011Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Fungal xylanases has important applications in food, baking, pulp and paper industries in addition to various other industries. Xylanases are produced extensively by both bacterial and fungal sources and has tremendous potential of being active at extremes of temperature and pH. In the present study an effort has been made to explore the codon bias perspective of this potential enzyme using bioinformatics tools. Multivariate analysis has been used as a tool to study codon bias perspectives of xylanases. It was further observed that the codon usage of xylanases genes from different fungal sources is not similar and to reveal this phenomenon the relative synonymous codon usage (RSCU) and base composition variation in fungal xylanase genes were also studied. The codon biasing data like GC content at third position (GC(3S)), effective codon number (N(C)), codon adaptive index (CAI) were further analyzed with statistical softwares like Sigma1plot 9.0 and Systat 11.0. Furthermore, study of translation selection was also performed to verify the influences of codon usage variation among the 94 xylanase genes. In the present study xylanase gene from 12 organisms were analyzed and codon usages of all xylanases from each organism were compared separately. Analysis indicates biased codon among all 12 fungi taken for study with Aspergillus nidulans, Chaetomium globosum, Aspergillus terreus and Aspergillus clavatus showing maximum biasing. N(C) plot and correspondence analysis on relative synonymous codon usage indicate that mutation bias and translation selection influences codon usage variation in fungal xylanase gene. To reveal the relative synonymous codon usage and base composition variation in xylanase, 94 genes from 12 fungi were used as model system.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.