Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19758450›Full record

ArticleBMC microbiology2009

High-level chromate resistance in Arthrobacter sp. strain FB24 requires previously uncharacterized accessory genes.

Kristene L Henne, Cindy H Nakatsu, Dorothea K Thompson, Allan E Konopka

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC microbiology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 87 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Implantation ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2022
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Biodegradation of persistent environmental pollutants by Arthrobacter sp.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2019
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Chromate Resistance Mechanisms in Leucobacter chromiiresistens.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2018
    Article
  10. Genes · 2018
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kristene L HenneDepartment of Biological Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana 47907, USA. khenne@purdue.edu
Cindy H Nakatsu
Dorothea K Thompson
Allan E Konopka
Purdue University West Lafayette · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe genome of Arthrobacter sp. strain FB24 contains a chromate resistance determinant (CRD), consisting of a cluster of 8 genes located on a 10.6 kb fragment of a 96 kb plasmid. The CRD includes chrA, which encodes a putative chromate efflux protein, and three genes with amino acid similarities to the amino and carboxy termini of ChrB, a putative regulatory protein. There are also three novel genes that have not been previously associated with chromate resistance in other bacteria; they encode an oxidoreductase (most similar to malate:quinone oxidoreductase), a functionally unknown protein with a WD40 repeat domain and a lipoprotein. To delineate the contribution of the CRD genes to the FB24 chromate [Cr(VI)] response, we evaluated the growth of mutant strains bearing regions of the CRD and transcript expression levels in response to Cr(VI) challenge.

resultsA chromate-sensitive mutant (strain D11) was generated by curing FB24 of its 96-kb plasmid. Elemental analysis indicated that chromate-exposed cells of strain D11 accumulated three times more chromium than strain FB24. Introduction of the CRD into strain D11 conferred chromate resistance comparable to wild-type levels, whereas deletion of specific regions of the CRD led to decreased resistance. Using real-time reverse transcriptase PCR, we show that expression of each gene within the CRD is specifically induced in response to chromate but not by lead, hydrogen peroxide or arsenate. Higher levels of chrA expression were achieved when the chrB orthologs and the WD40 repeat domain genes were present, suggesting their possible regulatory roles.

conclusionOur findings indicate that chromate resistance in Arthrobacter sp. strain FB24 is due to chromate efflux through the ChrA transport protein. More importantly, new genes have been identified as having significant roles in chromate resistance. Collectively, the functional predictions of these additional genes suggest the involvement of a signal transduction system in the regulation of chromate efflux and warrants further study.

Indexed as

ArthrobacterBacterial ProteinsChromatesChromiumCloning, MolecularDNA, BacterialDrug Resistance, BacterialGene Expression Regulation, BacterialGenes, BacterialGenetic Complementation TestMembrane ProteinsMultigene FamilyRegulatory Elements, TranscriptionalSequence Analysis, DNABacterial ProteinsChrA protein, BacteriaChromatesChromiumDNA, BacterialMembrane Proteins

Identifiers

PMID19758450
PMCPMC2751784
OpenAlexW2055851405

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.