Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19757865›Full record

ReviewPharmacoEconomics2009

Methods for measuring temporary health States for cost-utility analyses.

Davene R Wright, Eve Wittenberg, J Shannon Swan, Rebecca A Miksad, Lisa A Prosser

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in PharmacoEconomics, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. EuroQol (EQ-5D) health utility scores for patients with migraine.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2011
    Trial
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Estimates of Quality-Adjusted Life-Year Loss for Injuries in the United States.Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Patient and societal value functions for the testing morbidities index.Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making · 2013
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Davene R WrightPreferences Working Group, Center for Health Decision Science, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Eve Wittenberg
J Shannon Swan
Rebecca A Miksad
Lisa A Prosser

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A variety of methods are available to measure preferences for temporary health states for cost-utility analyses. The objectives of this review were to summarize the available temporary health-state valuation methods, identify advantages and disadvantages of each, and identify areas for future research. We describe the key aspects of each method and summarize advantages and disadvantages of each method in terms of consistency with QALY theory, relevance to temporary health-state-specific domains, ease of use, time preference, and performance in validation studies. Two broad categories of methods were identified: traditional and adapted. Traditional methods were health status instruments, time trade-off (TTO), and the standard gamble (SG). Methods adapted specifically for temporary health-state valuation were TTO with specified duration of the health state, TTO with a lifespan modification, waiting trade-off, chained approaches for TTO and SG, and sleep trade-off. Advantages and disadvantages vary by method and no 'gold standard' method emerged. Selection of a method to value temporary health states will depend on the relative importance of the following considerations: ability to accurately capture the unique characteristics of the temporary health state, level of respondent burden and cognition, theoretical consistency of elicited preference values with the overall purpose of the study, and resources available for study development and data collection. Further research should focus on evaluating validity, reliability and feasibility of temporary health-state valuation methods.

Indexed as

Health StatusCosts and Cost AnalysisDelivery of Health CareHealth Care CostsHumansPatient SatisfactionQuality-Adjusted Life Years

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.