Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19757196›Full record

ArticlePathology oncology research : POR2009

The effect of LMWH (Nadroparin) on tumor progression.

Zsuzsanna Nagy, Vera Turcsik, György Blaskó

Abstract readControlled Clinical Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Pathology oncology research : POR, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Targeting heparin and heparan sulfate protein interactions.Organic & biomolecular chemistry · 2017
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Significantly inhibitory effects of low molecular weight heparin (Fraxiparine) on the motility of lung cancer cells and its related mechanism.Tumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine · 2015
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. D-dimer as a potential prognostic marker.Pathology oncology research : POR · 2012
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Zsuzsanna NagyDepartment Clinical Oncology, St. Imre Hospital, Budapest, Hungary.
Vera Turcsik
György Blaskó
Szent Imre Egyetemi Oktatókórház · HUUniversity of Debrecen · HU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent clinical studies on patients with malignancies, who were treated with UHF and LMWHs raised the possibility, that these agents may possess an inhibitory effect on tumor progression. Further studies supported that this effect is independent from the anticoagulant and antithrombotic action. In this retrospective study oncological patients with an increased risk for thromboembolism were choosen, who received prophylactic treatment with an LMWH (nadroparin) at least for 6 months. Comparing with the control group, in some subgroups (T3 and T4, as well as M1) the LMWH-treated patients showed a significantly increased survival.

Indexed as

Disease ProgressionAnticoagulantsAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBreast NeoplasmsColonic NeoplasmsCyclophosphamideEpirubicinFemaleFluorouracilHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateLeucovorinMaleNadroparinNeoplasm StagingOvarian NeoplasmsAnticoagulantsCyclophosphamideEpirubicinFluorouracilLeucovorinNadroparinPaclitaxel

Identifiers

PMID19757196
OpenAlexW2040478205

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.