ArticleTropical animal health and production2010
Comparison of different testing schemes to increase the detection Mycobacterium bovis infection in Ethiopian cattle.
Article in Tropical animal health and production, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Gamma-interferon assay for the ancillary diagnosis of bovine tuberculosis in dairy cattle in urban and adjacent areas of Dhaka city, Bangladesh.Veterinary world · 2023Article
- Bovine Tuberculosis Antemortem Diagnostic Test Agreement and Disagreement in a Naturally Infected African Cattle Population.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2022Article
- Admixture mapping of tuberculosis and pigmentation-related traits in an African-European hybrid cattle population.Frontiers in genetics · 2015Article
- Differences in prevalence of tuberculosis in indigenous and crossbred cattle under extensive and intensive management systems in Tanga region of Tanzania.Tropical animal health and production · 2012Article
- Bovine tuberculosis in cattle in the highlands of cameroon: seroprevalence estimates and rates of tuberculin skin test reactors at modified cut-offs.Veterinary medicine international · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Host immune responses to Mycobacterium bovis (M. bovis) infection are variable at the different severity stages of pathology of the disease. In countries like Ethiopia, where routine screening of bovine TB is not undertaken, the use of tests which measure cellular and antibody responses may help for the maximum detection of infection. In the present study, 701 cattle were tested for bovine tuberculosis (BTB) using comparative intradermal tuberculin (CIDT) test, interferon (IFN)-gamma test, and lateral flow assay. The apparent prevalence was 32% when all the three tests were used, but varied from 23 to 25% when a pair of tests was used and from 9% to 15% when a single test was used. Agreement was observed between CIDT and IFN-gamma tests both at a cut-off >2 mm (Kappa +/- standard Error, k +/- SE, 0.129 +/- 0.045; 95%CI = 0.041,0.216) and a cut-off >4 mm (k +/- SE, 0.094 +/- 0.044, 95%CI = 0.008,0.179) while no agreement was observed either between CIDT test and lateral flow assay (k +/- SE, -0.04 +/- 0.033; 95%CI = -0.104,0.024) or between IFN-gamma tests and lateral flow assay (k +/- SE, -0.031 +/- 0.032; 95% CI = -0.093,0.031). Thus, the use of more than one test leads to the detection of the maximum number of infected animals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
19757135What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.