Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19757135›Full record

ArticleTropical animal health and production2010

Comparison of different testing schemes to increase the detection Mycobacterium bovis infection in Ethiopian cattle.

Gobena Ameni, Abraham Aseffa, Glyn Hewinson, Martin Vordermeier

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Tropical animal health and production, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Gobena AmeniAklilu Lemma Institute of Pathobiology, Addis Ababa University, P O Box 1176, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. gobenaameni@yahoo.com
Abraham Aseffa
Glyn Hewinson
Martin Vordermeier

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Host immune responses to Mycobacterium bovis (M. bovis) infection are variable at the different severity stages of pathology of the disease. In countries like Ethiopia, where routine screening of bovine TB is not undertaken, the use of tests which measure cellular and antibody responses may help for the maximum detection of infection. In the present study, 701 cattle were tested for bovine tuberculosis (BTB) using comparative intradermal tuberculin (CIDT) test, interferon (IFN)-gamma test, and lateral flow assay. The apparent prevalence was 32% when all the three tests were used, but varied from 23 to 25% when a pair of tests was used and from 9% to 15% when a single test was used. Agreement was observed between CIDT and IFN-gamma tests both at a cut-off >2 mm (Kappa +/- standard Error, k +/- SE, 0.129 +/- 0.045; 95%CI = 0.041,0.216) and a cut-off >4 mm (k +/- SE, 0.094 +/- 0.044, 95%CI = 0.008,0.179) while no agreement was observed either between CIDT test and lateral flow assay (k +/- SE, -0.04 +/- 0.033; 95%CI = -0.104,0.024) or between IFN-gamma tests and lateral flow assay (k +/- SE, -0.031 +/- 0.032; 95% CI = -0.093,0.031). Thus, the use of more than one test leads to the detection of the maximum number of infected animals.

Indexed as

Mycobacterium bovisAnimalsCattleEthiopiaFemaleInterferon-gammaMaleTuberculin TestTuberculosis, BovineInterferon-gamma

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.