Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19756712›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of applied physiology2010

Neuromuscular adaptations to 8-week strength training: isotonic versus isokinetic mode.

Anthony Remaud, Christophe Cornu, Arnaud Guével

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of applied physiology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Anthony RemaudLaboratory Motricité, Interactions, Performance (EA 4334), Faculty of Sport Sciences and Physical Activities, University of Nantes, Nantes, France. anthony.remaud@voila.fr
Christophe Cornu
Arnaud Guével

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Previous studies attempted to compare the effectiveness of isokinetic and isotonic training. However, they have provided conflicting results. The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of isotonic versus isokinetic standardized concentric strength training programs of the knee extensors on the neuromuscular system. The standardization of these two training programs was ensured by the equalization of the total external amount of work performed and the mean angular movement velocity. Thirty healthy male students were randomly assigned to the isotonic (IT; n = 11), the isokinetic (IK; n = 11) or the control (C; n = 8) group. Both IT and IK groups trained their dominant lower leg 3 sessions/week for 8 weeks on a dynamometer. The IT group exercised using a preset torque of 40% of the maximal voluntary isometric torque at 70 degrees (0 degrees = leg in horizontal position). The IK group exercised at a velocity ranging between 150 degrees and 180 degrees s(-1). Isotonic, isokinetic and isometric tests were performed on a dynamometer before and after strength training. Surface electromyographic activity of vastus lateralis, vastus medialis, rectus femoris, semitendinosus and biceps femoris muscles was recorded during the tests. Significant strength increases in both dynamic and static conditions were noticed for IT and IK groups without any significant difference between the two trained groups. Agonist muscle activity also increased with training but no change in antagonist muscle co-activity was observed. The two training methods could be proposed by clinicians and athletic coaches to improve concentric muscle strength in dynamic and static conditions.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PhysiologicalExerciseHumansIsotonic ContractionKneeLegMaleMuscle ContractionMuscle FatigueMuscle, SkeletalMuscle StrengthPhysical FitnessRange of Motion, Articular

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.