Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19756663›Full record

ReviewZeitschrift fur Rheumatologie2009

[Inflammatory myopathies].

B Schoser

Abstract readEnglish AbstractReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Zeitschrift fur Rheumatologie, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. [Myositides: What is the current situation?].Zeitschrift fur Rheumatologie · 2015
    Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

B SchoserFriedrich-Baur-Institut, Neurologische Klinik, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, München. bschoser@med.uni-muenchen.de
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Inflammatory myopathies cover infectious, focal and immunogenic myopathies. This review focuses on the clinical features, diagnostic techniques, pathogenesis and therapy of immunogenic myopathies. Besides myositis associated with other autoimmune disorders, dermatomyositis is the most common immunogenic myopathy. The independent diagnosis of polymyositis has come under debate, since within this group of patients some are now diagnosed as having either hereditary muscular dystrophy with inflammatory signs or inclusion body myositis (IBM). Even more strikingly, patients diagnosed with sporadic IBM may now be diagnosed with either a form of hereditary IBM or with a form belonging to the group of protein aggregate myopathies or myofibrillar myopathies. This re-classification reflects the well-known and clinically evident therapeutic dilemma in many of these patients. Thus the indication for muscle biopsy or rebiopsy requires new consideration and attention.

Indexed as

HumansMyositis

Identifiers

PMID19756663
OpenAlexW3192063271

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.