ArticlePediatric surgery international2009
Prospective evaluation of comorbidity and psychosocial need in children and adolescents with anorectal malformation. Part one: paediatric surgical evaluation and treatment of defecating disorder.
Article in Pediatric surgery international, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionAnorectal malformations represent a continuing challenge for the paediatric surgeon. Faecal and urinary incontinence can occur even with an excellent anatomic repair. We undertook a prospective evaluation of comorbidity and psychosocial needs in children and adolescents with anorectal malformation to test the hypothesis whether psychosocial workup in concert with an improved continence situation would lead to a better functional outcome in patients suffering from defecating disorders. Treatment of defecating disorder was based on differentiation between overflow pseudo-incontinence and true faecal incontinence. MATERIALS AND
methodsPatients who presented with soiling regardless of the type of anomaly were included in the study: 44 patients were investigated, 14 patients did not meet the criteria of the study, 30 patients aged 4-18 were evaluated. The surgical diagnostic program comprised a careful clinical history, physical examination, exact classification of the malformation, evaluation for associated defects, stool protocol.
resultsPatients were grouped in two different management programs according to their continence situation. Patients with pseudo-incontinence were treated with enemas, diet, anal hygiene, behavioural therapy and physiotherapy. Patients with true faecal incontinence were included in a bowel management program: 28 patients were free of symptoms of soiling after 3 days of hospital treatment and remained free of symptoms 6 months and 1 year later at re-evaluation. Two patients did not follow the therapeutic regime and therefore did not show an improved condition concerning soiling in the long run.
conclusionDifferentiating between overflow pseudo-incontinence and true faecal incontinence is the basis of an effective treatment of defecating disorders. All patients born with anorectal malformation can be kept clean of stool if they are subjected to an adequate treatment. A multidisciplinary approach is a valuable supplement to standard therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.