Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19756607›Full record

ArticleJournal of mathematical biology2010

An islet population model of the endocrine pancreas.

Pasquale Palumbo, Andrea De Gaetano

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of mathematical biology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Pasquale PalumboCNR-IASI, BioMatLab, UCSC Largo A. Gemelli 8, 00168, Rome, Italy.
Andrea De GaetanoCNR-IASI, BioMatLab, UCSC Largo A. Gemelli 8, 00168, Rome, Italy. andrea.degaetano@gmx.net.
Agostino Gemelli University Polyclinic · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An islet population model is proposed for pancreatic insulin secretion. Without detailing the chain of biochemical events giving rise to the delivery of insulin packets, the effect of the islets' bursting response to varying glucose concentration is described by a simple second order nonlinear model, of the same functional form for all islets, but with a random distribution of parameter values over the one million islets considered. The islet equations are coupled to a traditional model of the glucose/insulin dynamics to complete a description of the feed-back control of the glucose/insulin system. The model is thus based upon the completely random cooperation of a large number of independent controllers, all reacting to the same prevailing plasma glucose concentrations, but with distributed reaction characteristics. It is shown that the proposed model is able to replicate in silico different observed phenomena such as low frequency glycemia-insulinemia oscillations (ultradian oscillations, with a period between 50 and 150 min, amplified by constant glucose administration and entrained by an oscillating exogenous glucose infusion), as well as concordant induction of high-frequency insulin oscillations by a rapid periodic pulsatile glucose infusion. In order to reproduce by simulation all of the above observed phenomena, a single set of (hyper-)parameters has been used throughout, showing that it is indeed possible that a single model may explain the results of several published experimental protocols.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalActivity CyclesAlgorithmsAnimalsBlood GlucoseComputer SimulationFeedback, PhysiologicalHumansInsulinIslets of LangerhansBlood GlucoseInsulin

Identifiers

PMID19756607
OpenAlexW2043837907

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.