ReviewDer Internist2009
[Congenital heart disease. Transition from adolescence to adulthood].
Review in Der Internist, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Catheter-Based Interventions for the Management of Valvular Heart Disease During Pregnancy.JACC. Advances · 2022Review
- Improving medical care and prevention in adults with congenital heart disease-reflections on a global problem-part I: development of congenital cardiology, epidemiology, clinical aspects, heart failure, cardiac arrhythmia.Cardiovascular diagnosis and therapy · 2018Review
- Non-cardiac comorbidities in adults with inherited and congenital heart disease: report from a single center experience of more than 800 consecutive patients.Cardiovascular diagnosis and therapy · 2018Article
- Valvular Heart Disease and Pregnancy.Current treatment options in cardiovascular medicine · 2018Review
- [Pregnancy-related cardiac problems].Herz · 2014Review
- Pregnancy complicated by valvular heart disease: an update.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2014Review
- Cardiovascular diseases in pregnancy.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2011Review
- Keepers at the final gates: regulatory complexes and gating of the proteasome channel.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2004Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
There is a increasing clinical and scientific interest in adults with congenital heart disease. Germany is among, if not the first country worldwide, with a structured care of adults with congenital heart disease. Due to the advances in cardiology and in heart surgery, the primarily high mortality rate of relevant congenital heart disease has declined from 80% to less than 20% during the recent decades. Currently, in Europe the estimated number of adults with congenital heart disease is between 1.2 and 2.7 Mio., and the number in Germany exceeds 180,000. Almost all congenital heart defects, either native or interventionally or surgically treated, need regular control, since even after successful primary treatment significant residua or sequels have to be expected. Optimal care of these patients begins in the childhood and must be continued down to the high adulthood. The complexity of congenital heart defects makes a multidisciplinary approach necessary. A specialized, interdisciplinary cooperation between cardiologists, pediatric cardiologists, cardiac surgeons and other specialists is mandatory.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.