Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19756418›Full record

Trial reportInfection2009

Tobramycin once- vs thrice-daily for elective intravenous antipseudomonal therapy in pediatric cystic fibrosis patients.

J Riethmueller, M Ballmann, T W Schroeter, P Franke, R von Butler, A Claass, S Junge, G Doering, M Stern, German Multicenter Study Group

Abstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Infection, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 9 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 9 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 9 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Duration of intravenous antibiotic therapy in people with cystic fibrosis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019
    Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Home versus hospital intravenous antibiotic therapy for cystic fibrosis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2015
    Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Trial
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. The cumulative effects of intravenous antibiotic treatments on hearing in patients with cystic fibrosis.Journal of cystic fibrosis : official journal of the European Cystic Fibrosis Society · 2017
    Article
  14. Duration of intravenous antibiotic therapy in people with cystic fibrosis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2016
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Tobramycin and Beta-Lactam Antibiotic Use in Cystic Fibrosis Exacerbations: A Pharmacist Approach.The journal of pediatric pharmacology and therapeutics : JPPT : the official journal of PPAG
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 5 countries.

J RiethmuellerUniversity Children's Hospital, 72076, Tübingen, Germany. joachim.riethmueller@med.uni-tuebingen.de
M Ballmann
T W Schroeter
P Franke
R von Butler
A Claass
S Junge
G Doering
M Stern
German Multicenter Study Group
University Children's Hospital Tübingen · DELeibniz University Hannover · DEChildren's Clinical University Hospital · LVUniversity of Tübingen · DEUniwersytecki Szpital Dziecięcy · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeWe hypothesized that a single intravenous (iv) tobramycine infusion (treatment B) would have equivalent anti-infectious efficacy in chronic Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PA) infection in cystic fibrosis (CF) as the commonly performed treatment of three doses (treatment A) . Toxicity and practicability may even be improved in the single-dose regimen.

methodsThis was a randomized crossover study comparing outcome after 14 and 35 days. The primary end-point was a decrease in the leukocyte count, and the secondary end-points were clinical and lung function parameters, Pseudomonas quantification in sputum, and inflammation markers (immunoglobulin G, C-reactive protein) in serum. 30 patients (20 female, mean age 11.2 years, mean age range 1.7-18.1 years) received elective 14-day courses of treatments A or B, followed by the alternative treatment after a mean interval of 37 (+/- 21) weeks.

resultsWith the exception of PA density, there were no significant differences between both treatment strategies after 14 days of treatment. After 35 days of treatment, there were no significant changes in the leukocyte count and inflammation markers. Both treatment strategies reduced the bacterial load in the airways, as reflected by a decreased PA density in sputum. Nephrotoxicity was equal in both groups, with a transient slight elevation of urinary N-acetyl-beta-glucosaminidase concentrations. Standard audiometry tests revealed no evidence of a hearing impairment in any patient following therapy. Mean body weight increased during the study period by 0.5 kg. Forced expiratory volume increased by approximately 5% of the predicted volume, forced vital capacity increased by 2% of predicted capacity, and forced mid expiratory flow rate increased by 7% (A) or 4% (B) of the predicted normal value, although these changes were not statistically significant.

conclusionWe conclude that tobramycin given in a daily single dose (with the advantage of being more practical in a home environment) has an efficacy equal to that of three daily doses in terms of elective antipseudomonal therapy in clinically stable patients with CF.

Indexed as

AdolescentAnti-Bacterial AgentsChildChild, PreschoolCross-Over StudiesCystic FibrosisFemaleHumansInfantInfusions, IntravenousMalePneumonia, BacterialPseudomonas InfectionsTobramycinTreatment OutcomeAnti-Bacterial AgentsTobramycin

Identifiers

PMID19756418
OpenAlexW2036276557

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.