Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19755520›Full record

ArticleBrain : a journal of neurology2009

Magnetic resonance diagnostic markers in clinically sporadic prion disease: a combined brain magnetic resonance imaging and spectroscopy study.

Raffaele Lodi, Piero Parchi, Caterina Tonon, David Manners, Sabina Capellari, Rosaria Strammiello, Rita Rinaldi, Claudia Testa, Emil Malucelli, Barbara Mostacci and 5 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain : a journal of neurology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pons metabolite alterations in narcolepsy type 1.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Using NMR spectroscopy to investigate the role played by copper in prion diseases.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2020
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. MRS in early and presymptomatic carriers of a novel octapeptide repeat insertion in the prion protein gene.Journal of neuroimaging : official journal of the American Society of Neuroimaging · 2013
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Raffaele LodiMR Spectroscopy Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, Aging and Nephrology, University of Bologna, Azienda Universitario-Ospedaliera di Bologna, Via Massarenti 9, Bologna, Italy. raffaele.lodi@unibo.it
Piero Parchi
Caterina Tonon
David Manners
Sabina Capellari
Rosaria Strammiello
Rita Rinaldi
Claudia Testa
Emil Malucelli
Barbara Mostacci
Giovanni Rizzo
Giulia Pierangeli
Pietro Cortelli
Pasquale Montagna
Bruno Barbiroli
University of Bologna · ITAzienda USL di Bologna · ITPoliclinico S.Orsola-Malpighi · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The intra vitam diagnosis of prion disease is challenging and a definite diagnosis still requires neuropathological examination in non-familial cases. Magnetic resonance imaging has gained increasing importance in the diagnosis of prion disease. The aim of this study was to compare the usefulness of different magnetic resonance imaging sequences and proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy in the differential diagnosis of patients with rapidly progressive neurological signs compatible with the clinical diagnosis of sporadic prion disease. Twenty-nine consecutive patients with an initial diagnosis of possible or probable sporadic prion disease, on the basis of clinical and electroencephalography features, were recruited. The magnetic resonance protocol included axial fluid-attenuated inversion recovery-T2- and diffusion-weighted images, and proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy of the thalamus, striatum, cerebellum and occipital cortex. Based on the clinical follow-up, genetic studies and neuropathology, the final diagnosis was of prion disease in 14 patients out of 29. The percentage of correctly diagnosed cases was 86% for diffusion-weighted imaging (hyperintensity in the striatum/cerebral cortex), 86% for thalamic N-acetyl-aspartate to creatine ratio (cutoff </=1.21), 90% for thalamic N-acetyl-aspartate to myo-inositol (mI) ratio (cutoff </=1.05) and 86% for cerebral spinal fluid 14-3-3 protein. All the prion disease patients had N-acetyl-aspartate to creatine ratios </=1.21 (100% sensitivity and 100% negative predictive value) and all the non-prion patients had N-acetyl-aspartate to myo-inositol ratios >1.05 (100% specificity and 100% positive predictive value). Univariate logistic regression analysis showed that the combination of thalamic N-acetyl-aspartate to creatine ratio and diffusion-weighted imaging correctly classified 93% of the patients. The combination of thalamic proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy (10 min acquisition duration) and brain diffusion-weighted imaging (2 min acquisition duration) may increase the diagnostic accuracy of the magnetic resonance scan. Both sequences should be routinely included in the clinical work-up of patients with suspected prion disease.

Indexed as

14-3-3 ProteinsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAnalysis of VarianceBrainBrain ChemistryElectroencephalographyFemaleHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedLogistic ModelsMagnetic Resonance ImagingMagnetic Resonance SpectroscopyMaleMiddle Aged14-3-3 ProteinsPrion ProteinsPrionsPRNP protein, human

Identifiers

PMID19755520
PMCPMC2759338
OpenAlexW2122692476

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.