ArticleBMC health services research2009
The development, design, testing, refinement, simulation and application of an evaluation framework for communities of practice and social-professional networks.
Article in BMC health services research, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
28 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 66 citations in OpenAlex.
- Bridges, brokers and boundary spanners in collaborative networks: a systematic review.BMC health services research · 2013Pooled it
- Health professional networks as a vector for improving healthcare quality and safety: a systematic review.BMJ quality & safety · 2012Pooled it
- How and why are communities of practice established in the healthcare sector? A systematic review of the literature.BMC health services research · 2011Pooled it
- Trial
- A Virtual Community of Practice to Improve Primary Health Care Professionals' Attitudes Toward Patient Empowerment (e-MPODERA): A Cluster Randomized Trial.Annals of family medicineTrial
- Developing a values-based interorganisational Care at the End-of-Life Collaborative framework for the Australian context: A mixed-methods, practice-based research protocol.Palliative care and social practice · 2025Article
- Communication Between Anaesthesia Providers for Clinical and Professional Purposes: A Scoping Review.Anesthesiology research and practice · 2025Review
- Exploring value creation in a virtual community of practice: a framework analysis for knowledge and skills development among primary care professionals.BMC medical education · 2024Article
- Collaborative Learning: A Qualitative Study Exploring Factors Contributing to a Successful Tobacco Cessation Train-the-Trainer Program as a Community of Practice.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- The impact of organizational culture and leadership climate on organizational attractiveness and innovative behavior: a study of Norwegian hospital employees.BMC health services research · 2022Article
- Unprofessional behaviours experienced by hospital staff: qualitative analysis of narrative comments in a longitudinal survey across seven hospitals in Australia.BMC health services research · 2022Article
- Using social network analysis to understand multisectoral governance in district-level tobacco control programme implementation in India.BMJ global health · 2022Article
- A qualitative study exploring contributors to the success of a community of practice in rehabilitation.BMC medical education · 2021Article
- Tackling the wicked problem of health networks: the design of an evaluation framework.BMJ open · 2019Article
- Development and validation of a survey to measure features of clinical networks.BMC health services research · 2016Article
- Recovery Communities of Practice: An Innovative Strategy for Mental Health System Transformation.Psychiatric services (Washington, D.C.) · 2016Article
- Simulating patterns of patient engagement, treatment adherence, and viral suppression: a system dynamics approach to evaluating HIV care management.AIDS patient care and STDs · 2015Article
- Patterns of collaboration in complex networks: the example of a translational research network.BMC health services research · 2014Article
- Understanding social forces involved in diabetes outcomes: a systems science approach to quality-of-life research.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2014Article
- Assessing communities of practice in health policy: a conceptual framework as a first step towards empirical research.Health research policy and systems · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCommunities of practice and social-professional networks are generally considered to enhance workplace experience and enable organizational success. However, despite the remarkable growth in interest in the role of collaborating structures in a range of industries, there is a paucity of empirical research to support this view. Nor is there a convincing model for their systematic evaluation, despite the significant potential benefits in answering the core question: how well do groups of professionals work together and how could they be organised to work together more effectively? This research project will produce a rigorous evaluation methodology and deliver supporting tools for the benefit of researchers, policymakers, practitioners and consumers within the health system and other sectors. Given the prevalence and importance of communities of practice and social networks, and the extent of investments in them, this project represents a scientific innovation of national and international significance. METHODS AND
designWorking in four conceptual phases the project will employ a combination of qualitative and quantitative methods to develop, design, field-test, refine and finalise an evaluation framework. Once available the framework will be used to evaluate simulated, and then later existing, health care communities of practice and social-professional networks to assess their effectiveness in achieving desired outcomes. Peak stakeholder groups have agreed to involve a wide range of members and participant organisations, and will facilitate access to various policy, managerial and clinical networks. DISCUSSION: Given its scope and size, the project represents a valuable opportunity to achieve breakthroughs at two levels; firstly, by introducing novel and innovative aims and methods into the social research process and, secondly, through the resulting evaluation framework and tools. We anticipate valuable outcomes in the improved understanding of organisational performance and delivery of care. The project's wider appeal lies in transferring this understanding to other health jurisdictions and to other industries and sectors, both nationally and internationally. This means not merely publishing the results, but contextually interpreting them, and translating them to advance the knowledge base and enable widespread institutional and organisational application.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.