Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19754739›Full record

ArticleInsect molecular biology2009

Annotation and analysis of low-complexity protein families of Anopheles gambiae that are associated with cuticle.

R S Cornman, J H Willis

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Insect molecular biology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed, 99 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Matrix biology plus · 2019
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Comparative Analysis of the Integument Transcriptomes betweenInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2018
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

R S CornmanDepartment of Cellular Biology, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA. scott.cornman@gmail.com
J H Willis
University of Georgia · US

Funding

Cuticular proteins of Anopheles gambiaeR01AI055624 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA (UGA) · PI WILLIS, JUDITH · 2004 to 2014
$2.8M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI055624PHS HHS A155624
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We have characterized four new families of homologous genes of the mosquito, Anopheles gambiae, all of which include members shown by previous work to be cuticular in nature. The CPLCG, CPLCW, CPLCP, and CPLCA families (where CPLC is 'cuticular protein of low complexity') encode proteins with a high proportion of low-complexity sequence. We have also annotated the An. gambiae Tweedle genes, a family of cuticular protein genes first described in Drosophila, and additional ungrouped An. gambiae cuticular proteins identified by proteomics. Our annotations reveal multiple gene-family expansions that are specific to Diptera or Culicidae. The CPLCG and CPLCW families occur within a large and dynamic tandem array on chromosome 3R that includes sets of concertedly evolving genes. Most gene families exhibit two or more different expression profiles during development.

Indexed as

Amino Acid SequenceAnimalsAnophelesEvolution, MolecularGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression RegulationGenes, InsectInsect ProteinsLarvaMolecular Sequence DataMultigene FamilyPhylogenyReverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain ReactionSequence AlignmentTerminology as Topiccuticle proteins, insectsInsect Proteins

Identifiers

PMID19754739
PMCPMC3701952
OpenAlexW2049973401

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.