ArticleAnalytical chemistry2009
Standard-free quantitation of mixtures using clusters formed by electrospray mass spectrometry.
Article in Analytical chemistry, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Mass Spectrometry in Chiral Analysis and Synthesis.Chirality · 2026Article
- Unexpected behavior of diastereomeric ions in the GasPhase: a stimulus for pondering on ee measurements by ESI-MS.Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry · 2013Article
- Simultaneous quantitation of amino acid mixtures using clustering agents.Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry · 2011Article
- Direct standard-free quantitation of Tamiflu and other pharmaceutical tablets using clustering agents with electrospray ionization mass spectrometry.Analytical chemistry · 2010Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Ion abundances in electrospray ionization mass spectra depend on many factors, including molecular hydrophobicity, basicity, solution composition, and instrumental parameters. A recently introduced method that uses nonspecific cluster ion abundances to obtain solution-phase molar fractions of analytes directly from ESI mass spectra without using standards was evaluated using solutions containing 0.03-24% L-threonine, D-threonine, L-leucine, L-lysine, L-glutamic acid, or diglycine with L-serine as a major component. Because of the propensity of serine clusters to exhibit "magic" numbers, which can be chirally selective, these experiments provide a rigorous test of this standard-free cluster quantitation method, which requires that clusters form statistically from analytes in solution. For each of these solutions, the compositions of clusters containing > or = 32 molecules reflect the solution molar fractions of each component. From the abundances of these larger clusters, the solution molar fraction can be determined to better than 10% accuracy over nearly 3 orders of magnitude in concentration. In contrast, the ionization/detection efficiency of the individual amino acids differs by as much as a factor of 460 in these experiments. The protonated octamer incorporates some molecules statistically but efficiently excludes other molecules that have significantly different properties or chirality. This standard-free quantitation method may be most advantageous for rapidly characterizing mixtures, such as products of chemical synthesis, which contain unknown products or molecules for which suitable standards are not readily available.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.