Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19752750›Full record

ArticleJournal of immunotherapy (Hagerstown, Md. : 1997)2009

Genome-wide mapping of PiggyBac transposon integrations in primary human T cells.

Daniel L Galvan, Yozo Nakazawa, Aparna Kaja, Claudia Kettlun, Laurence J N Cooper, Cliona M Rooney, Matthew H Wilson

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of immunotherapy (Hagerstown, Md. : 1997), 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 77 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
77citing papers in PubMed
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

77 citing papers in PubMed, 127 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Generation and GMP scale-up of human CAR-T cells using non-viralMolecular therapy. Methods & clinical development · 2025
    Article
  10. Targeted gene delivery systems for T-cell engineering.Cellular oncology (Dordrecht, Netherlands) · 2024
    Review
  11. Accelerating Diverse Cell-Based Therapies Through Scalable Design.Annual review of chemical and biomolecular engineering · 2024
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. High mechanical property silk produced by transgenic silkworms expressing theFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2024
    Article
  16. Challenges and new technologies in adoptive cell therapy.Journal of hematology & oncology · 2023
    Review
  17. ASIS-Seq: Transgene Insertion Site Mapping by Nanopore Adaptive Sampling.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Characterizing piggyBat-a transposase for genetic modification of T cells.Molecular therapy. Methods & clinical development · 2022
    Article

17 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Daniel L GalvanDepartment of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
Yozo Nakazawa
Aparna Kaja
Claudia Kettlun
Laurence J N Cooper
Cliona M Rooney
Matthew H Wilson
Baylor College of Medicine · USThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · US

Funding

Tissue ResourceP50CA126752 · NCI · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI MALCOLM K. BRENNER, HELEN E HESLOP · 2007 to 2026
$51.4M
Training In Cell and Gene TherapyT32HL092332 · NHLBI · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI MALCOLM K. BRENNER, Bruno Di Stefano · 2008 to 2026
$6.9M
NCI NIH HHS P50 CA126752NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL092332NHLBI NIH HHS T32HL092332
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The piggyBac transposon system represents a promising nonviral tool for gene delivery and discovery, and may also be of value for clinical gene therapy. PiggyBac is a highly efficient integrating vector that stably transfects (approximately 40%) of primary human T cells for potential adoptive immunotherapy applications. To evaluate the potential genotoxicity of piggyBac, we compared 228 integration sites in primary human T cells to integrations in 2 other human-derived cell lines (HEK293 and HeLa) and randomly simulated integrations into the human genome. Our results revealed distinct differences between cell types. PiggyBac had a nonrandom integration profile and a preference for transcriptional units (approximately 50% into RefSeq genes in all cell types), CpG islands (18% in T cells and 8% in other human cells), and transcriptional start sites (<5 kb, 16% to 20% in all cell types). PiggyBac also preferred TTAA but not AT-rich regions of the human genome. We evaluated the expression of mapped genes into which piggyBac integrated, and found selection of more active genes in primary human T cells compared with other human cell types, possibly due to concomitant T-cell activation during transposition. Importantly, we found that in comparison to what has been reported for gammaretroviral and human lenitviral vectors, piggyBac had decreased integration frequency into or within 50 kb of the transcriptional start sites of known proto-oncogenes. Hence the piggyBac nonviral gene delivery system seems to represent a promising gene transfer system for clinical applications using human T lymphocytes.

Indexed as

DNA Transposable ElementsGenetic VectorsImmunotherapy, AdoptiveCpG IslandsGammaretrovirusGenome-Wide Association StudyHeLa CellsHumansLentivirusMutagenicity TestsT-LymphocytesTranscription Initiation SiteDNA Transposable Elements

Identifiers

PMID19752750
PMCPMC2796288
OpenAlexW2073109722

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.