ArticleJournal of drug targeting2010
Novel beta-lactamase-random peptide fusion libraries for phage display selection of cancer cell-targeting agents suitable for enzyme prodrug therapy.
Article in Journal of drug targeting, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Construction of an Enhanced Phage Display Library of Artificially Randomized vNARs from Cloudy Catshark (Scyliorhinus Torazame) and Screening against Miamiensis Avidus.Marine biotechnology (New York, N.Y.) · 2026Article
- Nanobody: A Small Antibody with Big Implications for Tumor Therapeutic Strategy.International journal of nanomedicine · 2021Review
- Current Management Strategies in Breast Cancer by Targeting Key Altered Molecular Players.Frontiers in oncology · 2016Review
- Bioinformatics resources and tools for phage display.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2011Review
- Cancer cell-specific internalizing ligands from phage displayed beta-lactamase-peptide fusion libraries.Protein engineering, design & selection : PEDS · 2010Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Novel phage-displayed random linear dodecapeptide (X(12)) and cysteine-constrained decapeptide (CX(10)C) libraries constructed in fusion to the amino-terminus of P99 beta-lactamase molecules were used for identifying beta-lactamase-linked cancer cell-specific ligands. The size and quality of both libraries were comparable to the standards of other reported phage display systems. Using the single-round panning method based on phage DNA recovery, we identified several beta-lactamase fusion peptides that specifically bind to live human breast cancer MDA-MB-361 cells. The beta-lactamase fusion to the peptides helped in conducting the enzyme activity-based clone normalization and cell-binding screening in a very time- and cost-efficient manner. The methods were suitable for 96-well readout as well as microscopic imaging. The success of the biopanning was indicated by the presence of approximately 40% cancer cell-specific clones among recovered phages. One of the binding clones appeared multiple times. The cancer cell-binding fusion peptides also shared several significant motifs. This opens a new way of preparing and selecting phage display libraries. The cancer cell-specific beta-lactamase-linked affinity reagents selected from these libraries can be used for any application that requires a reporter for tracking the ligand molecules. Furthermore, these affinity reagents have also a potential for their direct use in the targeted enzyme prodrug therapy of cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.