ArticleJournal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B, Statistical methodology2009
Variance estimation in the analysis of microarray data.
Article in Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B, Statistical methodology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Robust Classification Using Posterior Probability Threshold Computation Followed by Voronoi Cell Based Class Assignment Circumventing Pitfalls of Bayesian Analysis of Biomedical Data.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
- Simultaneous treatment of unspecified heteroskedastic model error distribution and mismeasured covariates for restricted moment models.Journal of econometrics · 2017Article
- Simulation-Extrapolation with Latent Heteroskedastic Error Variance.Psychometrika · 2017Article
- Proteomics and metabolomics in renal transplantation-quo vadis?Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation · 2013Review
- Joint Adaptive Mean-Variance Regularization and Variance Stabilization of High Dimensional Data.Computational statistics & data analysis · 2012Article
- Improved mean estimation and its application to diagonal discriminant analysis.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2012Article
- NONPARAMETRIC ESTIMATION OF GENEWISE VARIANCE FOR MICROARRAY DATA.Annals of statistics · 2010Article
- Nonparametric variance estimation in the analysis of microarray data: a measurement error approach.Biometrika · 2008Article
- Regularized Variance Estimation and Variance Stabilization of High Dimensional Data.Proceedings. American Statistical Association. Annual MeetingArticle
- R package MVR for Joint Adaptive Mean-Variance Regularization and Variance Stabilization.Proceedings. American Statistical Association. Annual MeetingArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Microarrays are one of the most widely used high throughput technologies. One of the main problems in the area is that conventional estimates of the variances that are required in the t-statistic and other statistics are unreliable owing to the small number of replications. Various methods have been proposed in the literature to overcome this lack of degrees of freedom problem. In this context, it is commonly observed that the variance increases proportionally with the intensity level, which has led many researchers to assume that the variance is a function of the mean. Here we concentrate on estimation of the variance as a function of an unknown mean in two models: the constant coefficient of variation model and the quadratic variance-mean model. Because the means are unknown and estimated with few degrees of freedom, naive methods that use the sample mean in place of the true mean are generally biased because of the errors-in-variables phenomenon. We propose three methods for overcoming this bias. The first two are variations on the theme of the so-called heteroscedastic simulation-extrapolation estimator, modified to estimate the variance function consistently. The third class of estimators is entirely different, being based on semiparametric information calculations. Simulations show the power of our methods and their lack of bias compared with the naive method that ignores the measurement error. The methodology is illustrated by using microarray data from leukaemia patients.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.