Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19749057›Full record

ArticleApplied and environmental microbiology2009

Comparison and utilization of repetitive-element PCR techniques for typing Lactobacillus isolates from the chicken gastrointestinal tract.

David P Stephenson, Robert J Moore, Gwen E Allison

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Applied and environmental microbiology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. DNA profiling ofFood science and biotechnology · 2017
    Article
  7. Phenotypic and molecular detection of the blaBMC infectious diseases · 2016
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Molecular identification of Lactobacillus spp. associated with puba, a Brazilian fermented cassava food.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2013
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

David P StephensonResearch School of Biology, Bldg. 41 Linnaeus Way, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 0200, Australia.
Robert J Moore
Gwen E Allison

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Three repetitive-element PCR techniques were evaluated for the ability to type strains of Lactobacillus species commonly identified in the chicken gastrointestinal tract. Enterobacterial repetitive intergenic consensus PCR (ERIC-PCR) produced species- and strain-specific profiles for Lactobacillus crispatus, Lactobacillus gallinarum, Lactobacillus johnsonii, and Lactobacillus reuteri isolates. The technique typed strains within these species equally as well as pulsed-field gel electrophoresis. DNA concentration and quality did not affect the ERIC-PCR profiles, indicating that this method, unlike other high-resolution methods, can be adapted to high-throughput analysis of isolates. Subsequently, ERIC-PCR was used to type Lactobacillus species diversity of a large collection of isolates derived from chickens grown under commercial and necrotic enteritis disease induction conditions. This study has illustrated, for the first time, that there is great strain diversity within each Lactobacillus species present and has revealed that chickens raised under commercial conditions harbor greater species and strain diversity than chickens raised under necrotic enteritis disease induction conditions.

Indexed as

Interspersed Repetitive SequencesAnimalsBacterial Typing TechniquesChickensCluster AnalysisDNA FingerprintingDNA PrimersElectrophoresis, Gel, Pulsed-FieldGastrointestinal TractGenotypeLimosilactobacillus reuteriPolymerase Chain ReactionPolymorphism, GeneticDNA Primers

Identifiers

PMID19749057
PMCPMC2772419

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.