Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19747393›Full record

ArticleBMC genetics2009

Improving power in genetic-association studies via wavelet transformation.

Renfang Jiang, Jianping Dong, Yilin Dai

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genetics, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Renfang JiangDepartment of Mathematical Sciences, Michigan Technological University, USA. rjiang@mtu.edu
Jianping Dong
Yilin Dai

Funding

Statistical Methods for Mapping Complex Disease GenesR01GM069940 · NIGMS · MICHIGAN TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY · PI ZHANG, SHUANGLIN · 2005 to 2007
$682k
NIGMS NIH HHS GM069940-01A2NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM069940
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA key to increasing the power of multilocus association tests is to reduce the number of degrees of freedom by suppressing noise from data. One of the difficulties is to decide how much noise to suppress. An often overlooked problem is that commonly used association tests based on genotype data cannot utilize the genetic information contained in spatial ordering of SNPs (see proof in the Appendix), which may prevent them from achieving higher power.

resultsWe develop a score test based on wavelet transform with empirical Bayesian thresholding. Extensive simulation studies are carried out under various LD structures as well as using HapMap data from many different chromosomes for both qualitative and quantitative traits. Simulation results show that the proposed test automatically adjusts the level of noise suppression according to LD structures, and it is able to consistently achieve higher or similar powers than many commonly used association tests including the principle component regression method (PCReg).

conclusionThe wavelet-based score test automatically suppresses the right amount of noise and uses the information contained in spatial ordering of SNPs to achieve higher power.

Indexed as

Bayes TheoremModels, GeneticPolymorphism, Single NucleotideAlgorithmsComputer SimulationGenome-Wide Association StudyHaplotypesHumansLinkage DisequilibriumQuantitative Trait, Heritable

Identifiers

PMID19747393
PMCPMC2759953

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.