Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19747234›Full record

ReviewAging cell2009

Hot topics in aging research: protein translation, 2009.

Brian K Kennedy, Matt Kaeberlein

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Aging cell, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Multifaceted deregulation of gene expression and protein synthesis with age.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Digital Gene Expression Profiling Analysis of Aged Mice under Moxibustion Treatment.Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2018
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Brian K KennedyDepartments of Biochemistry, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA. bkenn@u.washington.edu
Matt Kaeberlein
University of Washington · US

Funding

Mechanisms of Life Span Extension By Dietary DeprivationR01AG031108 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI KAEBERLEIN, MATT, VAN GILST, MARC R · 2008 to 2019
$3.2M
TOR, Translation and AgingR01AG033373 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI KENNEDY, BRIAN K · 2009 to 2013
$1.8M
Genome-wide Analysis of Aging in YeastR01AG025549 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI KENNEDY, BRIAN K · 2006 to 2010
$1.5M
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG 025549NIA NIH HHS R01 AG025549NIA NIH HHS R01 AG 031108NIA NIH HHS R01 AG031108NIA NIH HHS R01 AG 033373NIA NIH HHS R01 AG033373
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the last few years, links between regulation of mRNA translation and aging have been firmly established in invertebrate model organisms. This year, a possible relationship between mRNA translation and aging in mammals has been established with the report that rapamycin increases lifespan in mice. Other significant findings have connected translation control with other known longevity pathways and provided fodder for mechanistic hypotheses. Here, we summarize advances in this emerging field and raise questions for future studies.

Indexed as

AgingProtein BiosynthesisAnimalsHumansProtein KinasesRNA, MessengerTOR Serine-Threonine KinasesMTOR protein, humanmTOR protein, mouseProtein KinasesRNA, MessengerTOR Serine-Threonine Kinases

Identifiers

PMID19747234
PMCPMC3673879
OpenAlexW2136225615

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.