ReviewDrugs2009
Optimizing the use of thrombolytics in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.
Review in Drugs, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Aspect of thrombolytic therapy: a review.TheScientificWorldJournal · 2014Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The advent of thrombolytic therapy was a major advance in the treatment of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). The administration of fibrinolytic reperfusion therapy can reduce mortality rates by as much as 30%, with the greatest benefit observed if therapy is administered soon after symptom onset. Outcomes with thrombolytic therapy are improved if there is adjunctive treatment with aspirin, clopidogrel and an anti-thrombin agent. Although there is evidence that primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is the most effective reperfusion strategy, the majority of hospitals still do not have PCI capabilities and, thus, thrombolytic therapy remains a cornerstone of treatment for STEMI. Trials of thrombolytic therapy have demonstrated that initial patency rates can approach 85%, but there is still a need for improvement of non-invasive markers that predict failure or re-occlusion of the infarct-related artery. Because of the overwhelming data demonstrating the importance of rapid reperfusion, current studies are examining the role of earlier treatment of patients with STEMI via pre-hospital administration and/or coordinated systems for rapid diagnosis, transfer and delivery of definitive care. Facilitated PCI, a strategy of thrombolytic therapy followed by immediate PCI, has not been shown to be beneficial and current studies are examining the optimal timing of coronary angiography after thrombolytic therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.