Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19745111›Full record

ArticleGenome research2009

Complex selection on 5' splice sites in intron-rich organisms.

Manuel Irimia, Scott William Roy, Daniel E Neafsey, Josep F Abril, Jordi Garcia-Fernandez, Eugene V Koonin

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome research, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Is there any intron sliding in mammals?BMC evolutionary biology · 2020
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Introns in Cryptococcus.Memorias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz · 2018
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Origin of spliceosomal introns and alternative splicing.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology · 2014
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Widespread recurrent evolution of genomic features.Genome biology and evolution · 2012
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Constrained intron structures in a microsporidian.Molecular biology and evolution · 2010
    Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Manuel IrimiaDepartament de Genètica, Facultat de Biologia, Universitat de Barcelona, 08028 Barcelona, Spain.
Scott William Roy
Daniel E Neafsey
Josep F Abril
Jordi Garcia-Fernandez
Eugene V Koonin
Universitat de Barcelona · ESNational Institutes of Health · USBroad Institute · US

Funding

Comparative Analysis Of Completely Sequenced GenomesZIALM000073 · NLM · NATIONAL LIBRARY OF MEDICINE · PI KOONIN, EUGENE V · 2009 to 2025
$43.1M
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In contrast to the typically streamlined genomes of prokaryotes, many eukaryotic genomes are riddled with long intergenic regions, spliceosomal introns, and repetitive elements. What explains the persistence of these and other seemingly suboptimal structures? There are three general hypotheses: (1) the structures in question are not actually suboptimal but optimal, being favored by selection, for unknown reasons; (2) the structures are not suboptimal, but of (essentially) equal fitness to "optimal" ones; or (3) the structures are truly suboptimal, but selection is too weak to systematically eliminate them. The 5' splice sites of introns offer a rare opportunity to directly test these hypotheses. Intron-poor species show a clear consensus splice site; most introns begin with the same six nucleotide sequence (typically GTAAGT or GTATGT), indicating efficient selection for this consensus sequence. In contrast, intron-rich species have much less pronounced boundary consensus sequences, and only small minorities of introns in intron-rich species share the same boundary sequence. We studied rates of evolutionary change of 5' splice sites in three groups of closely related intron-rich species--three primates, five Drosophila species, and four Cryptococcus fungi. Surprisingly, the results indicate that changes from consensus-to-variant nucleotides are generally disfavored by selection, but that changes from variant to consensus are neither favored nor disfavored. This evolutionary pattern is consistent with selective differences across introns, for instance, due to compensatory changes at other sites within the gene, which compensate for the otherwise suboptimal consensus-to-variant changes in splice boundaries.

Indexed as

Genetic VariationSelection, GeneticAnimalsBase SequenceConsensus SequenceCryptococcusCryptococcus neoformansDrosophilaDrosophila melanogasterEvolution, MolecularIntronsMacacaPan troglodytesPhylogenyPrimatesRNA Splice SitesRNA Splice Sites

Identifiers

PMID19745111
PMCPMC2775602
OpenAlexW2076179852

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.