Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19742126›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2009

Bacterial stressors in minimally processed food.

Vittorio Capozzi, Daniela Fiocco, Maria Luisa Amodio, Anna Gallone, Giuseppe Spano

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Persistence ofFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Proteome Response ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2018
    Article
  17. Frontiers in microbiology · 2018
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Antimicrobial resistance in the food chain: a review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2013
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Vittorio CapozziDepartment of Food Science, University of Foggia, via Napoli 25, 71100 Foggia, Italy.
Daniela FioccoDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, University of Foggia, via L. Pinto 1, 71100 Foggia, Italy.
Maria Luisa AmodioDepartment of Production Sciences, Engineering, and Economics for Agricultural Systems (PrIME), University of Foggia, via Napoli 25, 71100 Foggia, Italy.
Anna GalloneDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, University of Foggia, via L. Pinto 1, 71100 Foggia, Italy.
Giuseppe SpanoDepartment of Food Science, University of Foggia, via Napoli 25, 71100 Foggia, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Stress responses are of particular importance to microorganisms, because their habitats are subjected to continual changes in temperature, osmotic pressure, and nutrients availability. Stressors (and stress factors), may be of chemical, physical, or biological nature. While stress to microorganisms is frequently caused by the surrounding environment, the growth of microbial cells on its own may also result in induction of some kinds of stress such as starvation and acidity. During production of fresh-cut produce, cumulative mild processing steps are employed, to control the growth of microorganisms. Pathogens on plant surfaces are already stressed and stress may be increased during the multiple mild processing steps, potentially leading to very hardy bacteria geared towards enhanced survival. Cross-protection can occur because the overlapping stress responses enable bacteria exposed to one stress to become resistant to another stress. A number of stresses have been shown to induce cross protection, including heat, cold, acid and osmotic stress. Among other factors, adaptation to heat stress appears to provide bacterial cells with more pronounced cross protection against several other stresses. Understanding how pathogens sense and respond to mild stresses is essential in order to design safe and effective minimal processing regimes.

Indexed as

Food HandlingStress, PhysiologicalBacteriaVegetablesfresh cutpathogensstressstressors

Identifiers

PMID19742126
PMCPMC2738913

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.