Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19741729›Full record

ReviewLeukemia2009

The use of novel agents in the treatment of relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma.

J P Laubach, A Mahindra, C S Mitsiades, R L Schlossman, N C Munshi, I M Ghobrial, N Carreau, T Hideshima, K C Anderson, P G Richardson

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Leukemia, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 78 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. New proteasome inhibitors in myeloma.Current hematologic malignancy reports · 2012
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

J P LaubachDepartment of Medical Oncology, Harvard Medical School, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA. jacobp_laubach@dfci.harvard.edu
A Mahindra
C S Mitsiades
R L Schlossman
N C Munshi
I M Ghobrial
N Carreau
T Hideshima
K C Anderson
P G Richardson
Harvard University · USDana-Farber Cancer Institute · USCleveland Clinic · US

Funding

Targeting cell trafficking as a new therapeutic modality for Multiple MyelomaR01CA133799 · NCI · DANA-FARBER CANCER INST · PI GHOBRIAL, IRENE M. · 2008 to 2011
$1.4M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA133799
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although outcomes for patients with multiple myeloma (MM) have improved over the past decade, the disease remains incurable and even patients who respond well to induction therapy ultimately relapse and require additional treatment. Conventional chemotherapy and high-dose therapy with stem cell transplantation (SCT) have historically been utilized in the management of relapsed MM, but in recent years the immunomodulatory drugs (IMiDs) thalidomide and lenalidomide, as well as the proteasome inhibitor bortezomib, have assumed a primary role in this setting. This review focuses on the role of thalidomide, lenalidomide and bortezomib in relapsed and refractory MM, with additional discussion dedicated to emerging drugs in relapsed MM that may prove beneficial to patients with this disease.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsBoronic AcidsBortezomibHumansImmunologic FactorsImmunosuppressive AgentsLenalidomideMultiple MyelomaPyrazinesSalvage TherapyThalidomideTreatment OutcomeAntineoplastic AgentsBoronic AcidsBortezomibImmunologic FactorsImmunosuppressive AgentsLenalidomidePyrazinesThalidomide

Identifiers

PMID19741729
PMCPMC3133628
OpenAlexW1974798389

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.