Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19741702›Full record

ReviewNature2009

Chromosome crosstalk in three dimensions.

Anita Göndör, Rolf Ohlsson

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 79 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
79citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

79 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Male-Specific Long Noncoding RNAInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2019
    Article
  7. Understanding the 3D genome: Emerging impacts on human disease.Seminars in cell & developmental biology · 2019
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Mango: a bias-correcting ChIA-PET analysis pipeline.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2015
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

19 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Anita GöndörDepartment of Microbiology, Tumor and Cell Biology, Nobels väg 16, Box 280, Karolinska Institute, SE-171 77 Stockholm, Sweden. anita.gondor@ki.se
Rolf Ohlsson

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The genome forms extensive and dynamic physical interactions with itself in the form of chromosome loops and bridges, thus exploring the three-dimensional space of the nucleus. It is now possible to examine these interactions at the molecular level, and we have gained glimpses of their functional implications. Chromosomal interactions can contribute to the silencing and activation of genes within the three-dimensional context of the nuclear architecture. Technical advances in detecting these interactions contribute to our understanding of the functional organization of the genome, as well as its adaptive plasticity in response to environmental changes during development and disease.

Indexed as

Chromosome PositioningGene Expression RegulationAnimalsCell NucleusChromosomesHumansNucleic Acid ConformationTranscription, Genetic

Identifiers

PMID19741702

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.