ArticleNature2009
Post-publication sharing of data and tools.
Article in Nature, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
41 citing papers in PubMed.
- Toward Better Semantic Interoperability of Data Element Repositories in Medicine: Analysis Study.JMIR medical informatics · 2024Article
- Common-sense approaches to sharing tabular data alongside publication.Patterns (New York, N.Y.) · 2021Review
- Sharing biological data: why, when, and how.FEBS letters · 2021Article
- Open Accessibility in Education Research: Enhancing the Credibility, Equity, Impact, and Efficiency of Research.Educational psychologist · 2021Article
- Article
- MEAnalyzer - a Spike Train Analysis Tool for Multi Electrode Arrays.Neuroinformatics · 2020Article
- Patent Ethics: The Misalignment of Views Between the Patent System and the Wider Society.Science and engineering ethics · 2018Article
- The abortion and mental health controversy: A comprehensive literature review of common ground agreements, disagreements, actionable recommendations, and research opportunities.SAGE open medicine · 2018Review
- Creating a data resource: what will it take to build a medical information commons?Genome medicine · 2017Article
- Open data and digital morphology.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2017Review
- How Does One "Open" Science? Questions of Value in Biological Research.Science, technology & human values · 2017Article
- Global open data management in metabolomics.Current opinion in chemical biology · 2017Review
- The Sharing Experimental Animal Resources, Coordinating Holdings (SEARCH) Framework: Encouraging Reduction, Replacement, and Refinement in Animal Research.PLoS biology · 2017Article
- Tools and techniques for computational reproducibility.GigaScience · 2016Review
- The creation and characterisation of a National Compound Collection: the Royal Society of Chemistry pilot.Chemical science · 2016Article
- Show and tell: disclosure and data sharing in experimental pathology.Disease models & mechanisms · 2016Review
- Article
- Processing and Analysis of Multichannel Extracellular Neuronal Signals: State-of-the-Art and Challenges.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2016Review
- Use and misuse of material transfer agreements: lessons in proportionality from research, repositories, and litigation.PLoS biology · 2015Article
- Legal agreements and the governance of research commons: lessons from materials sharing in mouse genomics.Omics : a journal of integrative biology · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Despite existing guidelines on access to data and bioresources, good practice is not widespread. A meeting of mouse researchers in Rome proposes ways to promote a culture of sharing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.